## Equation Showing as "False"

## Equation Showing as "False"

(OP)

When I open a blank instance of MathCAD Prime 6.0.0.0, and I evaluate the following equation, it evaluates as false. When I remove the units it evaluates as true. What is happening and why do the units impact this?

12.75

12.75 + 6*1.5

12.75 + 6*1.5 does equal 21.75.

Note that I am using the Comparison version of the equals sign (CTRL =).

Any help is appreciated! Thanks!

12.75

**in**+ 6*1.5**in****=**21.75**in**---- This evaluates as false.12.75 + 6*1.5

**=**21.75 ------------- This evaluates as true.12.75 + 6*1.5 does equal 21.75.

Note that I am using the Comparison version of the equals sign (CTRL =).

Any help is appreciated! Thanks!

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Cheers

Greg Locock

New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

All Mathcad units are converted to SI prior to evaluation, and a small amount of round-off error can be accumulated in the process. As an example - try evaluating:

12.75 in + 6 * 1.5 in - 21.75 in

This should yield precisely zero mm (or inches), but my copy of Prime 2.0 says it is -1.11E-16 metres.

It's always risky to evaluate a numerical result using exact equality; you really need to set up a test for "close enough to being equal" - where what is "close enough" will depend on your application.

In the evaluation above , the error is about 1/10 the diameter of a proton, which would typically be "close enough" for most practical engineering applications. (It is however MUCH bigger than the Planck Length, so could give erroneous results if quantum effects come into play in your distance measurements! )

http://julianh72.blogspot.com

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Cheers

Greg Locock

New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

On the "Calculation" tab, in the "Worksheet Settings" group, click "Calculation Options" then select "Approximate Equality". According to the On-Line Help:

Approximate EqualityControls the standard used in Boolean comparisons and truncation functions. When this option is not active, two numbers must differ by less than the maximum accuracy of your computer's floating point processor to be considered equal. Numbers from −10

^{-307}to 10^{-307}are considered to be 0. When truncating numbers, all decimal places are used in determining the floor, ceiling, or truncated value of a number.When this option is active, the absolute value of the difference between two numbers divided by their average must be < 10

^{-12}for them to be considered equal, and only the first 12 decimal places are used in truncation.If the OP enables "Approximate Equality", the original "False" evaluation should now show "True". Note however that this level of approximation (1 : 10

^{-12}) may not always yield the desired "correct" response - this will depend on how you set up your numerical comparisons.http://julianh72.blogspot.com

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

And that results in the below, even though the conversion to SI units is exact. Mathcad 14 shows zero for the example below

TTFN (ta ta for now)

I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Don't forget that deep down, Mathcad uses binary numbers for storage and calculation. While Mathcad "knows" that one inch is EXACTLY 25.4 mm (only one decimal place in floating point representation is required for exact precision), the binary repræsentation of 25.4 might be something like 11001.011001100110011.... (with an indefinite number of "binary places" - possibly infinite, to get a precise conversion). Numbers are only stored and manipulated to a finite number of binary digits, so round-off at the last binary digit is to be expected.

Note:

1.1102230246...E-16 happens to be the value of the 53rd binary digit (= 1/2

^{53}) past the "binary decimal point" (1/2^{1}, 1/2^{2}, 1/2^{3}, 1/2^{4}, ..., 1/2^{52}, 1/2^{53}, 1/2^{54}, ...), so that is a likely clue as to the nature of the rounding error which is observed.http://julianh72.blogspot.com

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Many simple decimal fractions can have an indefinite or even infinite number of binary "decimal" places, so round-off error is almost inevitable. (E.g. 0.40 decimal is 0.01100110011... recurring in binary representation.)

Use the "Approximate Equality" function to handle

mostof these issues for you, but for the most bullet-proof code, create your own test for "close enough" (according to the application).http://julianh72.blogspot.com

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Note for example that when you add and subtract several dimensioned terms and end up with a zero result, SMath presents the answer as a unitless "0.00". You can append units of mm (or inches etc), to show the result as "0.00 mm", but you can also append any units you like, and have the result shown as "0.00 kg" for example. SMath evaluates a dimensioned value of "zero mm" (for example) as being unitless 0.00, losing the original dimensions of length in the process, and it will report that 0.00 kg is equal to 0.00 mm.

Mathcad Prime is rather more robust than SMath in this respect - a dimensioned expression which results in a zero value will still show the units as "0.0 mm" (or whatever).

SMath will even evaluate an expression with mixed dimensions if one of the mismatching dimensioned terms cancel out; e.g.:

12.75 in + 6*1.5 in - 21.75 in + 6 kg - 2*2.99 kg = 0.02 kg

Mathcad will flag this expression as having incompatible units.

http://julianh72.blogspot.com

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

SMath will tell you that you have nothing (but it won't tell you what it is that you have none of - it could be no apples, or no oranges ... or no elephants, for that matter.)

Mathcad won't even try to work it out - it won't let you add and subtract apples and oranges (or elephants) at the same time.

http://julianh72.blogspot.com

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

TTFN (ta ta for now)

I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

You could try to round the value on both sides of the equation. We do not have prime but in mathcad15 this works to round down values with units:

Round(12.1234mm,0.01mm)=12.12mm.

Note in Mathcad15 there is a difference between round() and Round().

Regards,

Rob

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

As it should be... you have nothing left, whether they be apples, oranges or elephants...

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

TTFN (ta ta for now)

I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

On the positive side... you likely don't get many elephants, either. Thanks, I never thought of the derivative in that fashion... good memory jogger...

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik

## RE: Equation Showing as "False"

If you're doing the maths to rendezvous the SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule with the ISS, you want to calculate something like:

v

_{Dragon}- v_{ISS}and try to arrange for this to be close to zero m/s when the separation closes to zero metres.

Things could get pretty ugly if your software decides that zero metres (separation) is the same thing as zero m/s (differential velocity) and allows for a rendezvous with an indeterminate closing velocity.

To put it another way - Mathcad might test for:

Successful docking = Zero separation AND Zero closing velocity

If you're not careful with your test algorithms, SMath might deem a successful docking to occur when:

Successful docking = Zero separation OR Zero closing velocity

Units matter!

http://julianh72.blogspot.com