×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Shake Table - Seismic - Scaling

Shake Table - Seismic - Scaling

Shake Table - Seismic - Scaling

(OP)
Hello Engineers

Consider a uniaxial, horizontal motion, small scale shake table used to evaluate seismic retaining wall stability (sliding and overturning); comparing resultant horiz displacements for various accelerations and durations using simplified sinusoidal input motion.

1:12 scale – similar to Chopra’s classroom shake table, using welded steel plates with a 10 inch tall plate to represent a 10 ft tall concrete wall (“inverted tee” cantilever wall).
The model backfill is compacted moist sand (wc ~ 5% to 10%, sieve #10 to #40). That is, the steel weldment is placed over a small bed of sand, then manually backfilled.

The bed dimensions: 20" wide x 20" long x 12" tall
Actuation is via a high power, high torque servo motor with control time step increments to 1/1000 second.

Here's the Question: Can you point me to references on how to scale sample recorded free field ground motion, so it is meaningful and realistic for a 1:12 scaled model for displacement and acceleration.

Sample ground motion: The 1940 El Centro max ground displacement = 8.12 inches, with max ground acceleration = 0.319g for that textbook event.

Proposal:
Scaled Model Peak Displacement (amplitude): Scaling down by a factor = 1 / 12 (that is, peak amplitude = 0.677 inches, normalized for sinusoidal motion),
Scaled Model Peak Acceleration: No scaling (that is, equivalent peak acceleration = 0.319g, normalized for sinusoidal motion), which means the frequency would have to increase by the root to maintain the target acceleration

Does the scaling sound right? I'm sure many universities have done this many times. Inviting comments and criticism.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Functional Prototyping Using Metal 3D Printing
Functional prototypes are a key step in product development – they give engineers a chance to test new ideas and designs while also revealing how the product will stand up to real-world use. And when it comes to functional prototypes, 3D printing is rewriting the rules of what’s possible. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close