×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Truss internal diagonal effective length
3

Truss internal diagonal effective length

Truss internal diagonal effective length

(OP)
Someone please refresh my memory..

A standard steel warren truss supporting roof decking - I would typically take effective lengths of internal diagonals as 1.0L. Can this legitimately be taken as 0.7 or 0.85L?

(Trying to get an old truss to work on paper!)

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

you're talking about effective length, ie accounting for partial fixity at the ends.

1) is the end more than a single fastener ? if no, then 1

2) is the end multiple fasteners, or one of those mesh plate thingies ? if yes then maybe 0.85

3) 0.7 seems optimistic (but what do I know)

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

Alcan used to publish a design handbook for aluminum and the effective length for truss diagonals was 0.9 x length.

Dik

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

Need more info:

1) what kind of chords.

2) what kind of webs and how are they oriented with respect to their local axes?

3) what kind of connection.

4) Are you studying buckling in the plane of the truss or perpendicular to it? Liberalization is usually more appropriate in the plane of the truss.

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

(OP)
This relates to my other thread on the failed truss.. I have other (non failed) trusses within the building to either condemn or advise what load they can take.

Top/bottom and internals are all welded steel angle sections. Out of plane of truss I feel 1.0L is realistic as the bottom chord is only restrained at intermediate points. Top chord is restrained by the deck.


I’m considering

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

IRE,

Have you found out what was the cause in 0your case?

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

Cudos to SBI. I wanted to recommend the SJI values as both reasonably liberal and nicely defensible as well. I just didn't know where to find them in short order. In my Googling, I stumbled upon a pretty spiffy thesis from Bucknel that would suggest that even the SJI recommendations are quite conservative: Link. I only read the conclusions section, some of which is repeated below.

Caveat: all of the research involved symmetrical, double web setups.







RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

(OP)
Retired13 - the jury’s still out on that one. The truss appears to be overstressed - BUT it looks like it took a bang also. So hey, we were ALL correct!

Interestingly we found buckling of another truss during further survey works today so I think there’s a bigger issue here.

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

IRE,

Thanks for the update. It is quite intriguing event, wish to know more.

RE: Truss internal diagonal effective length

(OP)
Yeah, I intend adding to the other thread once I know more. So I won’t leave you all hanging!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Solutions Brief - Protecting and Rescuing On-Ground Personnel
Keeping our warfighters safe and delivering them a competitive advantage is a key goal of departments of defense around the world. It’s a goal shared by embedded computing manufacturers like Abaco: we never forget who we serve.This case study describes how a major international contractor integrated an Abaco single board computer at the heart of its CAS/CSAR solution. Download Now
Datasheet - Top Enhancements Creo 7.0
PTC's Creo 7.0 has breakthrough innovations in the areas of generative design, real-time simulation, multibody design, additive manufacturing, and more! With Creo 7.0, you will be able to design the most innovative products faster than ever before, keeping you on the cutting edge of product design and ahead of your competition. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close