Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Hydroelectric Water Tower Corrosion 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
nicknikolov

nicknikolov

Mechanical
Aug 7, 2020
3
I'll be inspecting and determining the integrity of a very old (installed 1965) surge tank used in a hydroelectric project.

The latest drawings on the project are all dated to 1965, and the tank is stated to have a corrosion allowance of 3/32".

Since this tank is not under pressure, I believe this corrosion allowance was arbitrarily picked. Also, since it is an old tank there will definitely be significant corrosion. Not sure if I should just stick to what was picked by the engineer that originally stamped the drawings, or if I should make a more specialized recommendation.

Are there any detailed reports or studies that have dealt with these non-code, non-pressurized tanks? If I see a single point with corrosion greater than 3/32" is that enough to condemn the tank, or at least require a new coating in the area?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
You can always weld build up at such locations and then flush them.

Anyway, check API 510 for guidance.

DHURJATI SEN
Kolkata, India

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Make a random UT inspection to avaliate the remaining thickness.Then decide if the tank supports some patches and a new anticorrosion coating or simply condemn the tank.

luis
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
There is actually one step in between. Do a UT survey, concentrate near the bottom and near the top water level. If the results look highly suspect then the tank needs to be drained, cleaned, and inspected in more detail, then decide if repair is feasible, if it is repair, blast and coat; if not then start designing the replacement.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The UT crew is worried they can't get good UT measurements from the inside of the tank due to the rust build up. And operations does not want to remove any insulation from the outside of the tank. I'm working on this communication in the mean time, but for now an extensive UT survey of welds and wall thickness' is not possible.

The UT crew is proposing to use a pencil probe that gives data in a very small area and can get around the rust.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
nicknikolov without eggs one can't make omelettes.

luis
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
They will have to strip sections of insulation or at least create inspection ports (which should be there anyway). They only other options is to drain and blast the ID, and that really should be a later step.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
"And operations does not want to remove any insulation from the outside of the tank."

Hard luck. Tell them they need to remove the insulation if they want a report that's actually going to be useful.

Operations need to get their head out of their behind and do things which make the inspection possible, not be obstructive.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I agree about the insulation, I'll keep pushing on that part.

The dam will be shutdown and the tank will be drained anyway. So if the corrosion is not as bad as expected, UT from the inside should not be an issue.

Did not know tanks would have inspection ports, once on site I'll look around for these. The tank is quite large (40' diameter x 100' height).

Mostly wondering about the corrosion allowance on non-code tanks. The 15-20% rule is similar to the initially stated corrosion allowance on the 1965 drawing so I might just go with that.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
As an operator... You'll want to gauge from the "good" side under the insulation. This will prevent the gauger from targeting pits and give you an average thickness. Individual deep pits result in leakage can be dealt with but you need to know average wastage to prevent structural failure.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
  • Question
Corrosion(?) on stainless at a waste water plant
Replies
7
Views
6K
Big_Daddy
B
M. BR
  • Question
Corrosion inside a tube
Replies
1
Views
2K
Magcargo
M
nyfi
  • Question
Senior corrosion technologist. 2
Replies
4
Views
3K
nyfi
nyfi
nabeel3
  • Question
What type of Corrosion 1
2
Replies
25
Views
13K
mfgenggear
mfgenggear
bimr
  • Locked
  • Question
CT Corrosion 4
2
Replies
33
Views
11K
TugboatEng
TugboatEng

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom