Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

User Warning Message 4690 (CNTGAPERR) - FEMAP/NASTRAN

User Warning Message 4690 (CNTGAPERR) - FEMAP/NASTRAN

User Warning Message 4690 (CNTGAPERR) - FEMAP/NASTRAN

I have noticed that FEMAP reports that the gap between glue faces of some elements in gap pairs are overly large, even when there is no visible gap between the faces in the model. What is the reason for this false error and is there any way to fix it, if the geometry used to create the mesh is already in contact? What is the best way to know if this is actually causing an inaccuracy in the model.

I have only seen this error when connecting edge of shell elements to face of solid elements.

The gap between glue faces of some elements in gap pair 22 between
regions 37 and 35 seems overly large. The largest values are listed
in the table below:


157893 51686 7.65885E-02
157893 52386 7.65885E-02
157882 51730 7.65870E-02
157882 52430 7.65870E-02
157882 51739 6.48329E-02
157882 52439 6.48329E-02
157893 51697 6.48329E-02
157893 52397 6.48329E-02
157883 51724 5.00000E-02
157883 51727 5.00000E-02

RE: User Warning Message 4690 (CNTGAPERR) - FEMAP/NASTRAN

This is a notice message, only informative.
Best regards,

Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial

WEB: http://www.iberisa.com
Blog de FEMAP & NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/

RE: User Warning Message 4690 (CNTGAPERR) - FEMAP/NASTRAN

Thanks Blas. I know it's only a warning, and not a fatal error, but I don't want to write it off as nothing without understanding what is happening. Is it quite normal to have this warning when connecting the edge of a shell structure to the face of a solid? In reality I am not connecting two faces at all, but rather an edge to a face, so the warning is a little strange that the "face" of two elements is far away.

I have viewed the deflected shapes, all connections look to behaving as expected and I have also ran a normal modes eigenvalue solution and I do not see the model "separating" at any of the connection points. I assume these methods of checking are typically adequate to ensure the warning isn't indicative of a real problem.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Functional Prototyping Using Metal 3D Printing
Functional prototypes are a key step in product development – they give engineers a chance to test new ideas and designs while also revealing how the product will stand up to real-world use. And when it comes to functional prototypes, 3D printing is rewriting the rules of what’s possible. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close