×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

(OP)
Hi everyone,

I have been doing a lot of research but cannot find a solid answer on how to account for P-Delta effects properly in ETABS (big P-Delta, let’s ignore little P-delta in this post). I know there is also a method to add a load case specifically for P-Delta, but I want to look at the Preset P-Delta Options in ETABS, as seen in the attachment.

There are 3 methods:

1) None
2) Non-iterative – Base on Mass
3) Iterative – Based on Loads

I would like to know when you use each of these methods. Method 1 is to simply ignore P-Delta effects in the model. As far as I understand if you do this you have to check Equation 12.8-16 of ASCE 7. If your Theta is under 0.10 then you can totally ignore P-Delta. But if it is greater than 0.10 then you have to increase your member forces and deflections by a factor of 1/(1-Theta). This is always an option.

But if you know you already will have to consider P-delta - say for a flexible moment frame building - it seems easier to let the software do the calcs and adjust the forces automatically. So that gets me to which method do I use, iterative or non-iterative? I have seen posts suggesting both ways, and the CSI wiki is really confusing.

https://wiki.csiamerica.com/display/etabs/P-Delta+...

It says that “when gravity load is specified, we recommend using Iterative.” But what does that mean? When is gravity load not specified? When is it appropriate to use non-iterative based on mass procedure?

So then if we assume I should use Iterative based on loads approach what loads do I add and which factors do I apply? The CSI Wiki link above seems to suggest that I add Dead and Live loads with the factors they are assigned using the lateral load analysis combinations. For example, if I have 1.32D + L + EQ then I would add 1.32 to the DL and 1.0 to the LL for P-Delta. But I have read other publications that suggest using 1.2 for DL and 1.6 for LL. Does anyone have any clarity on this?

Thanks for your help!

RE: P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

From what I understand, you would use iterative P-Delta if you have a susceptible structure or doing the detailed design. Iterative P-Delta will increase model run times.

Non-iterative is an approximation. It places very soft springs at each joint in the model - you can see it when you turn on reactions. I queried this last year with CSI and got the following answer:

Quote (CSI)

These are reactions at internally assigned springs (with negligible stiffness) used for applying Pdelta effect based on mass. See attached for Non-iterative Pdelta based on mass which is an approximate procedure that can be used for lateral only models. Iterative Pdelta is always recommended especially for complete models (gravity+lateral).

RE: P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

My thoughts:

1) Ignore P-Delta: You might use this early on in design. As you're working on setting member sizes. The reason for this, is that if you don't have your drift under control, you might get your analysis to diverge when using option 3.
2) Non-Iterative based on Mass: Honestly, I don't see a reason to use this very often. The help file suggests cases where you have rigid diaphragms, but you don't have loads defined for each level, but where masses are defined. I can't picture many structural models where this would be true.
3) Iterative based on loads: Always use this method. Unless you are in the early stages of design where you don't have all your member sizes defined yet or where you haven't properly defined your loading yet.

RE: P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

(OP)
Just to follow up on this. I have had some talks with the engineers at CSI over the last few weeks and they recommend using Iterative Based on Loads and applying 1.2D + 1.0L in the load cases. Or if your live load factor is not 1.0 for your seismic or wind case then apply whatever the load factor is in the lateral load case.

RE: P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

I don't use ETABS, but I would be interested to know how they do the non-iterative analysis, if there is an open document available.

But with computer speeds these days I agree that the iterative analysis is the way to go.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: P-Delta Preset Analysis in ETABS

first check the second order to firsts order moment ratio. if it is >10% then go for an iterative non-linear analysis for pi-delta consideration.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close