Quantities in parentheses
Quantities in parentheses
(OP)
Typically, when authoring work instructions, production routers, or other engineering documents, I am accustomed to enclosing quantities within parentheses within sentences. "Drill Ø.250 hole (6) plcs." would be commonly used nomenclature. Lately, a coworker is critiquing my work and swears by the concept of using numeric values without parentheses for values up to ten, and the spelled out word, followed by the same value in parentheses, for values greater than ten, as in "Chamfer .030 x 45° four plcs." Can anyone shed some light on the commonly preferred practice for engineering documentation?
RE: Quantities in parentheses
A hole callout complying with these standards would be like 4X Ø .250 THRU. Drill, mill file or grind that hole would be left up to the mfg engineer. I know because I looked at making solidworks fit the company drafting standard for hole callouts I work with and decided it was more than I was up for.
RE: Quantities in parentheses
RE: Quantities in parentheses
NOTES:
1.)
2.)
Just pick one, the . or the ), why both?
RE: Quantities in parentheses
RE: Quantities in parentheses
Daft, I say, that's more like chamfer .030 x 45° twenty-two (22) places.
NO. Say everything once and only once, that way when you revise it, you don't have to hunt down the extras.
22X .030 x 45° CHAMFER
RE: Quantities in parentheses
(Or so I have been told)
RE: Quantities in parentheses
RE: Quantities in parentheses