Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Hello All,

I am trying to simulate the contact problem of hyperelastic material with a rigid body in Abaqus-Standard using Implicit dynamics. Basically the hyperelastic material is falling upon a rigid ball (Analytical rigid) moving with certain velocity. During the simulation I observed that after the contact of the hyperelastic material with the ball, the material rebounds and then the whole mesh collapses.

Does anyone has faced the similar issue? And if yes can you give your suggestions?

Looking forward to the suggestions.


RE: Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Which type of elements and which hyperelasticity model do you use ? I think that it would be better to solve this problem using Explicit.

RE: Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Thanks for the reply.
I am using M3D4(4 node quadrilateral membrane) elements. Actually I have to use Implicit dynamics as per the problem statement of my thesis.

RE: Mesh collapse in Abaqus

I am using Holzapfel Anisotropy for my simulation

RE: Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Did you try using shell elements ? What are your contact settings, do you use general contact ?

RE: Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Actually I used membrane elements to avoid any bending resistance. I need it to act like a fabric.

I am using 4 contacts :
1. Surface to surface contact (Standard) between ball and hyperelastic material.
2. Self contact (Standard) between 1st surface of the hyperelastic material.
3. Self contact (Standatd) between the 2ns surface of the hyperelastic material.
4. Surface to surface contact (Standard) between table and hyperelastic material(Note: Table is not visible in the above pics which I have shared)

RE: Mesh collapse in Abaqus

Try solving this with general contact, you may get better results.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close