×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AWS D1.1 vs. AWS D1.4 for Rebar (A706) to Embed WPS

AWS D1.1 vs. AWS D1.4 for Rebar (A706) to Embed WPS

AWS D1.1 vs. AWS D1.4 for Rebar (A706) to Embed WPS

(OP)
So, I write/witness/test hundreds of welder and procedure qualifications each year in the lab among other things, and I’m more than comfortable with interpretation of any ASME-AWS-API-AWWA-MIL STD codes.

That said, I can’t make heads or tails of which code to use for writing this WPS for #4 A706 Rebar to an A36 embed plate. The rebar is laying horizontally on the embed, making the joint a flare-bevel groove weld. So, the small sentence in D1.4 saying all fillets are prequalified is out.

When I read through the testing requirements, it’s mind blowing to see how many and what tests are required for this simple joint to develop a PQR.. especially since the rebar has a low CE and has no pre-heat requirement. It doesn’t make sense to do that much testing, even though the foreword says the code is for rebar to low grade carbon etc.

That said, if it weren’t for the base metal grouping of the rebar, you could almost assume it’s prequalified per d1.1, and if you worry about how to manage the rebar range allowed, you could follow the max weld size for pjp single pass and that would get close enough.

I’m a black and white it’s code or not guy, but it just doesn’t make any sense !!!

Any guidance or thought would be much appreciated!! (Not tooting my horn, just needed to preface so I don’t get the rookie replies that are unwarranted for this reply)

Thanks !
-J

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close