×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

column size reduction over height (multistory) RC building

column size reduction over height (multistory) RC building

column size reduction over height (multistory) RC building

(OP)
dear engineers

i have inquiry regarding the reduction of columns over height of reinforced concrete frames

is it for strength of architecture or economic purposes ??

and what is the preferred condition for earthquake design is it reduction or maintaining the same size over height


thank you

RE: column size reduction over height (multistory) RC building

Column and moment frame actions decrease as you climb a multi-story building.

As such, column sizes (sometimes) also decrease.

Architects like this, because it gives them more usable floor space on the upper stories.

From a material standpoint, a smaller column uses less concrete, so it saves money that way.

From a design engineering standpoint, there is some detailing needed at joints when the column size changes, so we try to be strategic about when to change the size (typically not changing the size at every story).

From a construction engineering standpoint, it is also more efficient with formwork, etc., to keep the column size constant. This is why some buildings do not change column size at all, despite the fact that they (structurally) could. (These buildings often change the amount of column reinforcement instead).

----
just call me Lo.

RE: column size reduction over height (multistory) RC building

1) I agree with Lo that the cost is all about the formwork so the construction tendency is to maintain a particular column size for the entire building or, at the least, a number of stories at a time. I was once told to hold the column size for ten consecutive stories at a time on very tall buildings. I don't know that there was any magic to that number though.

2) For rectangular columns, and depending on the formwork system being used, there can be merit in decreasing one side dimension of a column while holding the other. See the sketch below.

3) Particularly in low to mid-rise buildings, the uppermost columns can be some of the highest demand columns at any level. That, because bending moments tend to be similar at all levels and, at the highest level, you don't have much axial load to kind of prestress the column and reduce reinforcing tension demand.

4) Unless there is an occupancy change part way up the building, it is often of little architectural consequence whether or not column size is decreased. Whatever accommodation has been arrived at for a 15th story condo unit is often equally applicable to an 30th story condo unit.

5) For tall buildings, a popular strategy is to use high strength concrete at the lower storeys, hold the column size, and reduce the concrete strength up the height of the building. This saves on concrete costs without incurring offsetting formwork costs.



RE: column size reduction over height (multistory) RC building

Quote (OP)

and what is the preferred condition for earthquake design is it reduction or maintaining the same size over height

For seismic performance, it is usually considered optimal to have all stories be of about the same lateral stiffness so that yielding and energy dissipation will be roughly uniformly distributed up the height of the building rather than aggregated at a few stories that then experience a ton of displacement demand. In this respect, for stories of equal height and uniform lateral system proportions, it would be desirable to maintain a consistent column size. That said, I haven't seen much of an attempt to enforce this strategy for "gravity" columns in practice in the markets in which I've worked.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close