Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

repair welding of a cracked compressor disk 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
NJavan

NJavan

Materials
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
7
Location
IR
Hi to All,

We are going to repair welding of a cracked compressor disk. The cracks are formed due to low cycle thermal fatigue. The disk material is ASTM A471 class 12 (Fe-0.45C-0.8Mn-1Cr-0.5Mo). We should qualify the welding procedure before welding on the disk. However, A471 is not available to make a test plate for welding qualification. Is it possible to use another material for making a test plate for qualification purpose? Are 4140 or 1045 steel being suitable choice? Would you please comment on this matter?

Many thanks,

Nima Javan




 
Sort by date Sort by votes
You need to match chemistry (well at least similar) and thermo-mechanical history.
So do you know the exact HT on your disc?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I concur with EdS; this is a critical part and you need to develop a procedure on the same material, not just the same category of material (e.g., as with P-number categories in ASME IX).
Distortion and residual stresses are potential concerns that a weld qualification test gives no information about.


"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks EDS and ironic metallurgist. Yes, the part is critical. But, the exact materials is not available. So, we have to use a similar material. 4140 has similar composition to that of A471-class 12. But, as you suggested, before welding, I think we should heat treat 4140 (Quench and tempering) to produce a tempered martensite microstructure in the steel. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
SAE 4140 is a reasonable facsimile.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
yes, that is how to do it. HT the sample material to give you the same strength.
Then you can work with pre-heat, welding, and PWHT.
Since this is a rotating componant you are really going to need to look at toughness and NDT.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Do you have pictures showing the cracks in the disc?
What operating temperatures are involved?


Is the disc to be repaired in situ? (So no PWHT as mentioned by others)
Will the operating conditions that caused the cracks continue?
If so, I'd be plenty scared that weld repairs will be quite short lived and develop cracks of their own.

Have you determined how deep the cracks are?
Are they in a location of high and significant hoop stress ?

Sometimes if grinding parts thinner by 10% or less, with large gentle radiuses and with excellent craftsmanship removes the indications it can be a satisfactory repair.
I'd follow up the grinding repair with shot peening.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks EDS and ironic metallurgist for your comments.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Tmoose,

Thanks for your comments.

The picture is attached. The cracks initiated from the balance holes on the surface of the disk. Some cracks are through thickness (i.e., the depth of some cracks is about 4 cm!). The cracks are probably formed due to thermal fatigue as a result of start up and shout down thermal stresses. The operating temperature is about 300 oC. The life of the disk is about 150,000 h. The hardness of the disk is about 240 HB with a tempered martensite microstructure.

The simulation results showed that the stress in the cracked region is about 350 MPa.

We should weld with sufficient pre-heat and then immediately PWHT using proper conditions.
Would you please give me your idea about GTAW filler metal selection? Two options are plausible. The first, is the use of match filler metal (e.g., ER110 or ER120). The second is the use of an undermatch filler metal (e.g. ER80) to reduce the susceptibility of cold cracking. What is your opinion?

 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=efff473b-fd5e-4b1b-a2b3-47ec2291b276&file=Cracked_Disk.png
Upvote 0 Downvote
NJavan said:
What is your opinion?
Click to expand...

Scrap and replace.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Dear ironic metallurgist, Thanks for your comment. But, what is your reason for this comment? The length of the crack?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
This is obvious a critical repair (cfr. application, stresses, material, ...), meaning this must be done to the highest standards. Are you confident you(r welders) will be able to weld this without any internal defects?
Keep in mind, any significant defect can (will) cause cracking to reappear.

While I regularly advise on difficult repairs, I do not feel confident on the (practical) feasibility of this one...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
kingnero said:
While I regularly advise on difficult repairs, I do not feel confident on the (practical) feasibility of this one...
Click to expand...

Precisely the basis for my advice.

BTW I have to wonder when I see balancing holes 180° opposite each other.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts."
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Dear kingnero,
Thanks for your advise.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Dear ironic metallurgist,

Thanks for your advise. You mentioned that " I have to wonder when I see balancing holes 180° opposite each other ". Would you please explain a little bit more? Thanks.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
How many cracks ?

Did your simulation include disc rotation as well as thermal goings-on ?

If just one or 2 I'd be mighty tempted to machine out the cracks with a ball end mill and call it good. Machine a similar detail opposite in an effort to maintain balance.
Will the rotor be re-balanced with the blades installed? Is there an OEM procedure how to seat the blades ( rev it to XXXX rpm )
if the part is to be balanced as an assembly.

I'd Also machine a radius on all the holes to improve the stress distribution.
Whacking/pressing a large ball bearing into each hole entry to create a chamfer loaded with compressive stresses might be of more benefit.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The best welding repair will not be equivalent to a new machined part in terms of fatigue cracking resistance. Any such repair should be considered temporary - sometimes very temporary.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
If only one balance procedure has been performed in the component's life so far, and the balance set up was good, and the operator was capable, then the drilling should only have been in one region ( the "heavy" spot ) on thin disk shaped object.

"Significant" holes opposite each other suggests a severe over-correction, or the set up was bad, and then fixed, or the operator mistakingly drilled on the light spot ( doh !!), or something.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Lining up the balance holes at the same radius as the bolt holes seems to be a design error which is causing a significant stress increase in the area between holes.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

krus1972
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Repair Welding Under Load
Replies
2
Views
3K
weldstan
weldstan
IdanPV
  • Question Question
Welding of S355JR
Replies
1
Views
481
kingnero
kingnero
metaleng123
  • Question Question
P91 correct repair procedure
Replies
1
Views
1K
weldstan
weldstan
Engingeeer
  • Question Question
nut welding fixture
Replies
2
Views
13K
Engingeeer
Engingeeer
P
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Welding a member on top of an existing weld
Replies
7
Views
5K
pinaki_stahlbau
P

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top