×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ETABS Sway Special and Sway intermediate

ETABS Sway Special and Sway intermediate

ETABS Sway Special and Sway intermediate

(OP)
Hi everyone,
I am designing a concrete building using ETABS 2016, my concrete design code is ACI 318-14 and i have ASCE 7-10 for defining live and seismic loads. after analyse and design procedure there were two beams with (S/O #2) error, because my seismic design category is D all the frames are SMRF (sway special), but when i changed the overwrites for those two beams to (sway intermediate) the error was solved and i got longitudinal reinforcement for these two beams as well, now the problem is solved but i don't know the reason, why was a beam over stressed (o/s) in sway special and not so in sway intermediate???
Hope i have asked the question clearly

RE: ETABS Sway Special and Sway intermediate

Sway intermediate design procedure is different than Sway special. If your structure is in Seismic Design Category D, then you design all your members as sway special. In sway special, for beam, there is beam shear calculation that etabs does based on the section and design reinforcement, by calculating probable moment. The two beams have been probably failing in Shear caused by probable moment. This concept isn't used for sway intermediate beams. You can check out chapter 19, of McGregor's book, maybe "Reinforced Concrete" for more details.

RE: ETABS Sway Special and Sway intermediate

And also know that your problem is not really solved, by getting the two beams passed.
You also have to check Joint Shear, which is another tedious work to do. Beams play lots of roles in smrf design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close