Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

Hi Folks, I have designed a small DC motor driven actuator that simply arcs a lever back and forth over a 10 mm arc. The system consists of a 1 start worm, and a 28 tooth helical gear. This lever has physical stops at both ends of travel. On occasion when the lever hits one of the stops, I experience bind between the gears and the system locks up. I need this system to actuate rather quickly, so cannot slow it down.

Is there any advice that anyone has to prevent a bind condition in a system like this? Would a 2 or 3 start worm prevent this?

RE: Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

What is the lead angle of the worm? Too low and the gearset is self-locking. You should still be able to drive it with the motor though. Maybe there is a locked-in load (preload) when banged against the stop.

RE: Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

So several questions.
Quality level
Correct contact pattern.
Mounting precision quality
Lube type.
Would a worm gear been better than a
Helical gear.

RE: Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

Thank you both for your interest. Currently it is a prototype so quality is not so good. Contact ratio is 2.0. Geometry is from a very expensive software tool. I would not expect this to be so sensitive.
The intention however is to produce this by injection molding, so will live with a cross helical gear arrangement.

My concern is not about backdrive.

It seems to me the binding only occurs when I have inertia. The system gains speed, hits a wall, and gets stuck. When the system is already against the wall and full power is applied, it does not get stuck.

So I am looking to understand what I can do to reduce or eliminate this, knowing I cannot slow the system down.. is there some theory I should apply to the design to balance inertia? Or is there some design rule for building a system like this?

Thanks again!

RE: Worm/Crossed Helical Gear Binding

Well contact ratio is good but that is not the same as contact pattern.
What is the gear material?

It doesn't matter if it is an expensive software. If the quality of workman ship is poor.
If the gear set has poor contact pattern.
(Profile of teeth having at least 80% contact on the profiles and is central.
The correct back lash is also critical.
Not enough and it will bind.
The shock or jolt of impact is not good for gears. Might want to rethink the design.
Some type of spring to absorb the shock.
If this is a propriety design.
Then you may need to hire a pro.
Get an NDA. To protect your design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close