Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Driven Pile Downward Capacity

Driven Pile Downward Capacity

Driven Pile Downward Capacity


It is my understanding that the driven pile downward capacity is the Ultimate pile capacity in Compression (please correct if I am wrong).

By following NAVFAC DM 7.02 guidance, I noticed they provide formulas for computing the allowable pile capacity (see attached).

NAVFAC does not specify a Factor of Safety when computing Qall.

Anyone knows what would be the FS in case I need to compute Q ultimate based on NAVFAC Q allowable formulas?


RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

The simple ENR formula has a theoretical factor of safety of 6. According to Chellis "Pile Foundations" apparently most other formulas have a SF of at least 1.5

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

The AASHTO LRFD spec applies a resistance factor of 0.5 to the the yield capacity (Fy*A). That applies so long as the pile is fully braced (embedded in soil). If the soil around the pile can scour out, or is otherwise partially exposed, then the unbraced portion is designed as a column. Combined with the use of load increase factors on the loads, the resulting safety factor for structural capacity is around 3.

The older AASHTO Standard spec used nominal loads and a capacity of 0.25Fy*A (SF=4)

Rod Smith, P.E., The artist formerly known as HotRod10

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

Thanks a lot Engineers,

2 more questions:

1 - Do you understand that the downward pile capacity is the ultimate capacity?,

2 - From the file attached, the ENR formula Qall = 2 WH / (S + 1). NAVFAC specifies S (average net penetration) in inches and H (effective height of fall) in feet. Do you think that makes sense?, it is my understanding that H needs to be inches.

Please let me know,

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

Ultimate capacity for a pile can be reached in several different ways that I can think of, and probably one or 2 I'm not thinking of:

1) There's the structural limit of the pile in compression, which we discussed above. That's typical for steel piles driven to refusal.

2)There's the structural limit for a pile in tension. Typically that's only reached by concrete drilled shafts in uplift, which some categorize as piles.

3) There's the geotechnical limits in bearing (resisting downward forces in end bearing and/or side friction) and uplift (side friction resisting upward loads).

For #2, I suspect the formula given is an approximation, not an actual equation, per se, so the units aren't necessarily consistent. I suppose they could have written it with a constant of 12 in the denominator and specified H in inches, but then the user would have to multiply H (which would typically be in feet) by 12 and then divide the answer by 12.

Rod Smith, P.E., The artist formerly known as HotRod10

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

The formulas have a built in safety factor, so that is the design load with the safety factor included. While the units don't seem right that is the way that formula works.

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

The NAVFAC or ENR formulas may not be the ones you want, as they do not AFAIK account for the LRFD approach, and the ENR formula is deprecated. FHWA has better guidance available here https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/libra... .

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

Thanks a lot engineers,

Oldestguy, if you are required to compute the Q ultimate (not Qall) using the ENR formula, what would you do?,

Qall = 2 WH / (S + 1), would you remove 2 from the numerator and use H in feet and S in inches?

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

The ENR formula is deprecated. Recommend that you look at the Modified Gates Formula if you must use a dynamic formula.

Regarding factors of safety, this reference may be helpful for non-LRFD approach, and has references to a number of informative papers: https://www.pile.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/14...

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

None of the dynamic formula is reliable unless it's calibrated via pile load test (static or high-strain dynamic)on a site.

RE: Driven Pile Downward Capacity

You do not need to correct the units in the ENR formula. The formula has been simplified over the years. The top of the equation originally had a 12 in it to convert from feet to inches. There was a FOS of 6 on the bottom of the equation. These have been combined into a 2 (12 divided by 6).

At one point the original article for the ENR formula was available on www.vulcanhammer.info. It is titled Piles and Pile Driving

Edit: Here is the article https://vulcanhammerinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - How ESI is Helping Move New Medical Device Product to Market Quicker & More Cost Effic
Early Supplier Involvement has long been a strategy employed by manufacturers to produce innovative products. Now, it almost seems like a necessity. Because decisions made in the design phase can positively affect product quality and costs, this can help add value to OEM bottom lines. This white paper will discuss many facets of ESI, including why it’s so valuable today, what challenges limit the benefits of ESI, how cost is impacted, and more. Download Now
White Paper - Moving to a Driverless Future
This white paper describes what we see as the best practices to support a sustainable engineering process for autonomous vehicle design. It exposes how to use simulation and testing in common frameworks to enable design exploration, verification and validation for the development of autonomous cars at a system, software and full-vehicle level to drive a mature product development process for automated driving. Download Now
Research Report - How Engineers are Using Remote Access
Remote access enables engineers to work from anywhere provided they have an internet connection. We surveyed our audience of engineers, designers and product managers to learn how they use remote access within their organizations. We wanted to know which industries have adopted remote access, which software they are using, and what features matter most. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close