Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

When a vessel shell has a bracket welded to its outside surface which has an external load applied to it, there are membrane, bending and peak stresses on the outside surface of the vessel shell, local to the bracket. Linearization is required to establish the linearized Membrane plus Bending stress at the outer surface. This is shown on the left hand side of the graph below.

My query relates to the inside surface of the vessel shell where there is no structural discontinuity and therefore no peak stress as per the right hand side of the graph. To calculate the Membrane plus bending stress on the inside surface do you re-use the linearized stress tensor components used for the outside surface and calculate a linearized M+B stress for the inside surface (the blue line)? Or do you accept that there is no peak stress on the inside surface and therefore just use the total stress (the brown line)?

RE: Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

Linearization will give you a membrane stress, and a bending stress at the inside and outside surface. Given that there is no peak stress on the inside, you would expect the linearized membrane plus bending to closely match the total stress, unless the mesh is relatively coarse. If you refine the mesh around the peak location you should see this influence drop out of your linearized result.

RE: Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

The peak stress associated with the structural discontinuity causes the individual linearized membrane and bending stress components to be higher or steeper respectively. As a result, when calculating the equivalent stress on the right hand side, the linearized value is always greater than the total value.
It is due to the maths of linearization. Mesh density doesn't affect it.
As this example is completely in bending, both sides should have the same value. As the total value on the right is the same as the linearized value on the left, it seems reasonable to say that linearization is not required on the side with no structural discontinuity.....for this specific example.
I was wondering if anyone else has experience with this or knows the industry standard convention.

RE: Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

Just follow the rules and perform the linearization. It will give you the correct answers. Stop trying to over-think it.

RE: Stress linearisation is not required when there is no peak stress

Upon carrying out further investigation, WRC 429 accepts the linearization method of judging "Linearity of the distribution of stresses" which is essentially what I have explained above, however recommends the use of non-judgement mathematical approach like the through thickness integration method used by ASME VIII Div 2....even if it is conservative.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Evolving Landscape of Commercial Battery-Powered Trucks
What’s driving the evolving landscape of truck electrification? What are the barriers, motivators and strategies for accelerating the electric transition? What insights and resources are available for today’s design engineers working to achieve industry disruption and evolution? For answers to these and other pertinent questions, read this white paper. Download Now
eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close