×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

How to avoid natural frequencies

How to avoid natural frequencies

How to avoid natural frequencies

(OP)
I have a truss structure and I can't get rid of 3 modes of vibration. I tried different configuration, increase the thickness of the pipes, nothing seems to help. Is there a general rule to follow? I've been trying trial and errors so far, maybe I'm missing something.

Thanks!

RE: How to avoid natural frequencies

So you are performing dynamic analysis (other than eigenfrequency extraction) and you want to avoid natural frequencies occuring in the range of excitation, right ? Or is it eigenfrequency simulation where you want to get different modes ?

Anyway, to modify natural frequencies you can follow the simple equation for eigenfrequency of 1 DOF system: f=√(k/m). This tells you that you have to change stiffness or mass (density) to get different natural frequencies. As you can see from the equation to increase f you have to increase stiffness or decrease mass. Another option is to use optimization to get desired frequencies.

RE: How to avoid natural frequencies

(OP)
It's actually eigenfrequency problem. I have to stay away from three specific frequency and unfortunately the structure still has natural modes in these frequency ranges so I was wondering if there was a rule to apply in order to change the structure and avoid the modes. I case it depends on case by case.

RE: How to avoid natural frequencies

If the first approach (changing stiffness and/or mass by modifying geometry) still doesn’t give you desired effect then I think it would be best to try with optimization. It can modify geometry in such way that selected eigenfrequencies will be avoided.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Addressing Tooling and Casting Requirements at the Design Stage
Several of the tooling and casting requirements of a part can be addressed at the design stage. If these requirements are not addressed at the design stage, lot of time is spent in design iteration when the design reaches the die caster. These design issues lead to increase in time and cost of production leading to delay in time to market and reduced profits for the organization. Download Now
White Paper - The Other Side of Design for Assembly
Assembly level constraints need to be satisfied before the design can move downstream. This white paper will go through the various assembly level issues, which need to be tackled by various organizations on a regular basis. Know more about DFMPro, a design for assembly software. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close