×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ETABS: Seismic storey response plots do not match base reactions?

ETABS: Seismic storey response plots do not match base reactions?

ETABS: Seismic storey response plots do not match base reactions?

(OP)
Hi all,

I'm working on a 9-storey building and I want to extract the seismic cumulative shear forces from the storey plots.

Upon closer examination, it seems like there is a mismatch between the base shear shown in the storey response plots and the base shear for the same load case in the base reactions table. See below:





There is a similar difference in the base overturning moments.

Granted, it's not a huge difference. But I've seen another ETABS model produced by a colleague showing much larger differences.

Does anyone know why this might be happening?

Thank you,
Ilyas

-------------
Ilyas

RE: ETABS: Seismic storey response plots do not match base reactions?

Hi Ilyas,
I am interested to see if anyone has an answer because I just found out the same thing. The difference is 1% but still I would expect the same value.
I presume you are talking about the equivalent static right?
The funny thing is that if you select all the 6 cases il the EQS load pattern (EQX, EQX+e, EQX-e, EQY, EQY+e, EQY-e) and check the results (EQ1, EQ2, EQ3, EQ4, EQ5, EQ6), all the base shear along the same direction match, but if you compare the base shears for one direction with those for the perpendicular direction, there is a difference.
Given that the equivalent static is purely based on floor mass, there should be no difference at all.
I did the same with the response spectrum. I created 6 cases RSX+e, RSX-e, RSY+e, RSY-e, RSX, RSY to compare with RS which is the ETABS default load case that includes the accelerations in both directions (U1, U2) with the code default eccentricity.
I found that the single cases are exactly the same (as I would expect), whereas the ETABS default one is actually higher (in my case +35%)
The problem is that I don't know what is the math behind the ETABS default algorithm.
I checked in all the documents I could find but found nothing.

Cheers
Davide

RE: ETABS: Seismic storey response plots do not match base reactions?

The base reaction moment are calculated about X=0,Y=0,Z=0 Zeros coordinate. This is not overturning moment of the building.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close