×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

(OP)
Dear All,

please guide me for following points,

1. What are the criteria's for FET of Valves
2. what are the tests required for valves which are used in Sour services with Toxic Gas.
3. Need to Know Any Standard specifies the requirement of FET


regards
Iranna

RE: Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

Hi,
FET - Fugitive Emission testing, for valve there are many international standards in the industry, most common ones are ISO 15848-1, API624, TALuft, generally applicable for both shut-off valves (Gate/globe) and also for control valves, ball valves etc, it involves endurance cycles 205 /1500/2500 etc hot/cold cycles,with test medium helium or methane, and Leakage rates A, B, C. You should get copy of the standard as it involves several aspects to be taken care. YOu have to use specially qualified gland packing, pls discuss with gland packing suppliers.

WHile API 624 is mandatory for all gate valves to API 600 and Gate / Globe valves to API 602, involves 310 hot (500 Deg F)/cold (Room T) cycles, test medium - Methane, and leakage rate max 100ppm, gland packing shall be API622 certified.

RE: Fugitive Emission Test For Valves


Hi Iranna Shettar,

Subramans answer says it all, with a good general summary. The world is big, and general questions will create general answers, and perhaps not what you want.

As often, answers will be better if you formulate a more precise question.

For instance:
FET: Several acronyms for transmission here. What exactly?
Sour service: also general. What market, customers. End users will generally differ on test types/requirements and refer to the actual local or company requirements.
Geographical area, state, country.
Fluid (Toxic gas?), temperature, pressure range.
Type of valve, size and pressure range.
Climatic conditions.
Surroundings, inside, outside, buried, submerged...

...and so on

RE: Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

hi

Please read and understand the standards ISO 15848 part 1 & 2 and SHELL Spec SPE 77/312.
these are the standards majorly accepted by the customers/end users throughout the world.
the test criteria & requirements, testing methods & types, required leakage class acceptance criteria are clearly mentioned in this standards.

Hope it will help to further to understand by your own... Thanks

Dinu...

There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure.

RE: Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

(OP)
Hi All,

Toxicity is a by product of any SOUR service product. The valve data sheet clearly mention SOUR service.
The question is simple;
How the valve manufacturer will prove that the valve is toxic gas leak proof if the valves are not subjected to FET?
I need an expert opinion to justify this and then can eliminate the FET requirement.
Please do the needful.


Iranna

RE: Fugitive Emission Test For Valves

Hi Iranna,

The answer is simple, you or valve manufacturer cannot justify that Fugitive Emission is not required. If it is requested by end user, then supplier should adhere that requirement.
Not on behalf other end users, but we as (western) European end user are mandated by some sort of clean air or fugitive emission act. Applicable for either the whole Plant or some portion of it.
And we're being audited on periodic basis. Of course for example fire water or cooling water is not subject for such audit.

Some counter arguments:
Sour can mean gas and might also contain H2S. Thus with the right conditions can leak through gland, body-bonnet, etc.
There is no guarantee, that ordered valve by certain person (planner) eventually will be used for previously planned location. It can end up to very toxic application.
Auditor do random if not full check before commissioning based on certificates, and also during commissioning with sniffer or FLIR camera. Some high risk Plant, if we're not comply with such fugitive requirement, then we have to pay some fine.

Better safe than sorry.
If it is a good valve, should pass the test. I see no reason for deviating fugitive emission.
We understand the risk of using inferior valve e.g. with potentially miss-aligned stem or low quality packing. But we use this usually for water or nitrogen application.

Regards,
MR


https://nosuchvalve.com
All valves will last for years, except the ones that were poorly manufactured; are still wrongly operated and or were wrongly selected

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?&rat1=2&f...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close