Hi Iranna,
The answer is simple, you or valve manufacturer cannot justify that Fugitive Emission is not required. If it is requested by end user, then supplier should adhere that requirement.
Not on behalf other end users, but we as (western) European end user are mandated by some sort of clean air or fugitive emission act. Applicable for either the whole Plant or some portion of it.
And we're being audited on periodic basis. Of course for example fire water or cooling water is not subject for such audit.
Some counter arguments:
Sour can mean gas and might also contain H2S. Thus with the right conditions can leak through gland, body-bonnet, etc.
There is no guarantee, that ordered valve by certain person (planner) eventually will be used for previously planned location. It can end up to very toxic application.
Auditor do random if not full check before commissioning based on certificates, and also during commissioning with sniffer or FLIR camera. Some high risk Plant, if we're not comply with such fugitive requirement, then we have to pay some fine.
Better safe than sorry.
If it is a good valve, should pass the test. I see no reason for deviating fugitive emission.
We understand the risk of using inferior valve e.g. with potentially miss-aligned stem or low quality packing. But we use this usually for water or nitrogen application.
Regards,
MR
All valves will last for years, except the ones that were poorly manufactured; are still wrongly operated and or were wrongly selected