Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

China ppm emission conversion

China ppm emission conversion

China ppm emission conversion

I am working in China at the moment and we did some SO2 sampling at the stack of a biomass incineration power plant.

We used a portable analyzer with a built-in cooler for moisture removal and the SO2 concentration is given in ppmv.

We needed to convert the ppmv values to a standard unit of mg/Rm3; where the reference conditions are 0 degC, 101.3 kPa, 6% O2 dry gas. The equation I used to do this is was:

SO2 [mg/Rm3] = SO2 [ppmv] * (molar mass [64]/molar volume [22.4]) * ((21-O2%ref)/(21-O2%act))

The molar volume of 22.4 being used was for gas at 0 degC, 101.3 kPa.

I am being told by our Chinese client that this is not correct and that I need to add additional corrections for temperature and pressure. The equation they suggest is:

SO2 [mg/Rm3] = SO2 [ppmv] * (molar mass [64]/molar volume [22.4]) * ((21-O2%ref)/(21-O2%act)) * (273/(273+127)) * (99970/101325)

With temperature and pressure values for the flue gas inside the stack. This formula gives lower SO2 concentrations than my original calculation, but I was not aware that the temperature and pressure correction were required when converting ppmv.

I am being told that the equation suggested by the Chinese client is the standard used by the government for emission reporting, but I am always hesitant to trust this type of statement immediately because misunderstandings and miscommunications are common.

I am not a chemical engineer and don’t know the science well enough to effectively demonstrate which equation is correct. Can someone please provide some guidance?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Functional Prototyping Using Metal 3D Printing
Functional prototypes are a key step in product development – they give engineers a chance to test new ideas and designs while also revealing how the product will stand up to real-world use. And when it comes to functional prototypes, 3D printing is rewriting the rules of what’s possible. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close