×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Unusual case of shear friction

Unusual case of shear friction

Unusual case of shear friction

(OP)
I am working with a precast block wall that is going to have vertical cells cast in to allow rebar. The rebar is going to be cast into a foundation below and the blocks will be slipped over the bars and stacked to form a wall. The cells are going to be filled with non-structural fill and the rebar will have a cap plate and nut at the top of the wall. My question is, if I design the cap plate and nut for the tensile capacity of the bar, can I say that shear friction is used to resist the in-plane shear loads of the wall? I essentially plan to "develop" the bar using this cap plate & nut instead of it being traditionally developed in concrete or grout, is this valid?

Our client tends to prefer options that make it more difficult on the structural side of things which lead to the unusual conditions described above, any input would be appreciated!

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

Looks like a post-tensioned segmental block retaining wall, assuming the bar will be tensioned at the end of the process. I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to count on the shear friction, at least the part of the equation that accounts for the resistance at the concrete interfaces. I don't think you can account for the shear capacity of the bars themselves, as the movement necessary to engage them would likely be excessive. I would use the method in your governing design code to calculate the prestess losses in the bars, to get the remaining compression at the block interfaces for use in the calculations for the interface shear resistance.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

(OP)
Thank you for the input @HotRod10, the only difference in my situation is that these bars are not scheduled to be post-tensioned. Assuming they are adequately tightened at the top such that there will be minimal elongation during a lateral event, can I still make these assumptions? I agree that the shaer capacity of the bars should be neglected since they are not in a proper structural grouted cell.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

If there won't be any permanent tension in the bars, then there's no permanent compression applied to the block interfaces, other than the weight of the blocks themselves. If you're considering seismic loading, I don't believe you can even count on the full weight of the blocks, as there may be dynamic vertical ground movement during an earthquake. What's left? Interlock of the block infill? I wouldn't count on that for the same reason as discounting the bars - too much displacement before engagement.

Why would you not post-tension the bars? All it takes is tightening the nut so that the bar remains permanently in tension. It's a fairly common procedure, usually using high-strength threadbar, but not much different with lower strength bars.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

Quote (ntn94)

Assuming they are adequately tightened at the top such that there will be minimal elongation during a lateral event, can I still make these assumptions?

I would say no if the rods will not be prestressed. While the code provisions don't mention it explicitly, I think that bar strain matters in addition to bar strength. Shear friction mobilizes a small amount of separation movement and, when it occurs, that needs to stress the reinforcement in a meaningful way in order to be effective. With, potentially, a much longer strain length for your clamping reinforcement, I question it's efficacy.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

The commentary for A23.3 does mention that the crack widening due to the rough surface is what causes tension in the bar. Without quantifiable tension in the bars, you've basically got nothing in the case of a seismic event as hotrod said.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

(OP)
Thank you all for the responses. After digesting everything, I agree that post-tensioning the bars will be required to justify this approach.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

Can we ask why would you fill the cores with non-structural fill, when you could just fill it with structural fill and not be worried about anything? I get the whole crazy client stuff, but seriously....

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

(OP)
@jayrod12 -The sleeves are created using PVC pipes that remain in the blocks. The bond between the grout and PVC pipe is not strong enough to develop the bar leading to the cap plate&nut approach.

@canwesteng -Are there any suggestions for the amount of post-tensioning that should be done to ensure proper functionality? I was going to use 10% of the bar capacity.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

What about changing to steel sleeves then? perhaps too costly? Other options to cure your issues might be equally expensive.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

Arbitrary check-in from the non-SE dude who reads all these threads..

If the bars are not substantially attached to the block wall (i.e. due to lack of bonding strength w/ the PVC sleeve, no meaningful long-axis attachment) AND they don't have significant tension applied by the nut at the top... what purpose do the bars actually serve? Seems like a PT strand that never gets PT'd isn't doing much of anything, other than absorbing dollars.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

I think jayrod's question was suggesting something more along the lines of grouting the cores to provide monolithic concrete across the joints between blocks.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

Ntn94:
The bars better be well embedded/secured a the found. if you are going to tension them. Then, I wonder what the condition of the threads at the top will be when you are done placing the blocks over them. And, that the contractor doesn’t bitch about threading these blocks over a 10’ high rod, swingin in the breeze is hard to imagine. I’ve seen this done with actual post tensioned rods, a hydraulic pulling jack at the top and run the nut down once the proper extension is achieved. They often leave a clean-out at the bottom, with a coupler nut on the bar sticking up out of the found, and then install the long bar after the blocks are in place. You apparently have an unusual condition on this project, that this is the first time some core shear, bond or horiz. joint friction is needed and becomes an issue. I wonder that the manufacturing process would change greatly if you got some 2-3” dia. electrical conduit cut to replace the PVC pipe they normally use. Special design conditions sometimes require some special thought or components.

RE: Unusual case of shear friction

Sounds to me like a search for an answer to a problem that doesn't exist. Conventionally laid block, reinforced and grouted, is a much better solution.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close