×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Experiences with batch detention systems

Experiences with batch detention systems

Experiences with batch detention systems

(OP)
Does anyone have experiences with batch detention systems they would like to share? I'm particularly interested in the design and modeling aspects of these systems. Since they involve active outlet controls (valves, gates, etc) they cannot be modeled with a standard head-dependent outlet device, such as a weir or orifice.

Here's a brief summary:

Batch detention basins capture and temporarily detain the water quality volume from a storm event using an automated controller and valve. They are intended to serve primarily as settling basins for the solids fraction, and as a means of limiting downstream erosion by controlling peak flow rates during erosive events. Batch detention basins may be constructed either online or offline, however, offline structures are preferred. Batch detention basins are designed to prevent clogging of the outflow structure and resuspension of captured sediment during a discharge. They also provide enhanced dissolved pollutant removal performance. The batch detention design typically incorporates a non-clogging outflow structure, such as an orifice protected by a trash rack, or a perforated riser pipe protected by riprap. Batch extended detention basins may be used in very small watersheds (no minimum size), since the discharge is regulated by a valve instead of an orifice. In addition, batch detention basins tend to accumulate debris deposits rapidly, making regular maintenance necessary to minimize aesthetic and performance problems. Batch detention basins can readily be combined with flood and erosion control detention basins by providing additional storage above the water quality volume.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net

RE: Experiences with batch detention systems

No experience, but there's some play in South Carolina and Georgia to move to floating skimmers for outlet controls on sediment basins. Idea is the orifice is just below the surface, maybe six inches, and is suspended by floats. Drains through a pipe that has a couple of adjusting bends so the float stays near the surface. The point is to pull water from the less sediment laden portion of the pond, letting the solids accumulate at the bottom.

I haven't had to model one of these yet, because they're temporary BMPs, but if I did I'd probably just back calculate the orifice flow based on constant head and use a constant discharge in the routing.

In these batch systems, do the valves adjust based on head or something? I would think unless there was some kind of widget that changed the valve opening based on head, the discharge relationship would still be based on head.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Experiences with batch detention systems

Peter - My guess these would be modelled similar to the water supply model with gravity tanks and operational valves. I have not analyzed these since college; but, I am sure Water-Gems, Water-CAD or other software packages could be used that use time enabled valves.

RE: Experiences with batch detention systems

never used an automatic controller / valve on a basin. Designs I have been involved with have manually operated slide gates, generally intended for low level drainage. They can also be opened during flood stage if necessary for more operational control of the reservoir level. Assuming that the valve is either open or closed, than you would just need to set the date/time of opening and closing in your model. Once it is open, than discharge is just based on the stage-discharge relationship of the orifice.
Don't think a constant outflow is an accurate way to model an orifice.

RE: Experiences with batch detention systems

(OP)
These are active systems. Here's a typical sequence:

1 Wait till WSE rises to target level (treatment volume)

2 Wait a further 12-48 hours for settling

3 Immediately lower control weir to current WSE

4 Gradually lower weir to empty pond at constant rate over desired draw-down time.

5 Reset weir for next event.

All monitored and managed by a smartphone app.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - A Guide to 3D Printing Materials
When it comes to using an FDM 3D printer effectively and efficiently, choosing the right material at the right time is essential. This 3D Printing Materials Guide will help give you and your team a basic understanding of some FDM 3D printing polymers and composites, their strengths and weaknesses, and when to use them. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close