×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

GD&T Interpretation Needed
2

GD&T Interpretation Needed

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

If the drawing is according to ASME Y14.5-2009 means that the internal pocket is only allowed to get smaller by the size tolerance 0.025 on each side.
Lets assume the basic dimension between the opposite sides is 10, then the maximum dimension is 10 and the minimum dimension is 10 - 0.025 - 0.025 (for both sides)


RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

The number after the U is always that portion of the total profile tolerance that adds "weight" to the part feature. Because the tolerance and number are the same in your case, all of the tolerance (material) is "inside" the basic shape. That's a smaller interior pocket. And the opposite if your drawing was for a raised "boss".

Certified Sr. GD&T Professional

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

If the lid goes inside the pocket I would say you care about its outer boundary, therefore zero tolerance zone shown on your drawing is probably correct.
As shown on your lid drawing, the shape (outside shape) is allowed only to get smaller.

Not sure if referencing B and C in the profile is correct.

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

(OP)
Thanks for your help greenimi.

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

I would be interested to see the full drawing of these parts. It is possible that the GD&T is applied incorrectly.

For the "lid", does the profile feature control frame have a circle at the knee of the leader? Does it have a between "x" and "y" designation for where this control starts and stops? The surfaces designated as datum features B and C lead me to believe that there may still be problems with the GD&T application.

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

Kenneth,

I am going to echo Andrew a little - is that profile tolerance meant to be all-around or just applied to the flat, planar face on which the leader line is directly attached? If the latter I have no issue, if the former I don't *technically* have an issue, but you should definitely be aware of the implications.

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

(OP)
Andrew,

I believe you are correct in that the GD&T is applied incorrectly for the part the lid is fitted to.

It's obvious to everyone involved in making the parts that the lid has to fit down inside the pocket, and they will machine accordingly.

Thanks for everyone's help.

RE: GD&T Interpretation Needed

Okay so since you didn't really quite answer the question, I'm just going to go ahead and forge onward with the assumption that the profile tolerance is applied "all-around" (which would require a different leader line type as Andrew noted to be unambiguous - Y14.5 does little to define which types of transitions link features together without the explicit use of the "between" or "all-around" notation).

If this is unwarranted/unwanted information I apologize - I also do not desire to once again open the can about self-referencing since it has been discussed here many, many times but I feel that people should know about it since its very common when people apply datum references and then unwittingly wrap them in an all-round profile tolerance which references those same datums. The short version is that from what I gather this practice is simultaneously not illegal but also not well supported (or at least well defined) by Y14.5-2009 (I have yet to fully read through 2018 but I doubt this has changed much if at all) - it exists in a gray area where there exists some level of consensus among the community on how it should be treated, but also brings up some of the finer aspects of GDnT - which can really throw a lot of people through a loop when either interpreting drawings or inspecting parts if they are not familiar with it.

I'll get off my soapbox here - as I said I don't want to drag out a long discussion on a well covered topic, I only desired to provide information. Heres some previous threads I've gathered which have some more in depth discussions:

https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=405622
https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=404621
https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=438924

A few documents from said threads which explain how this is treated:
https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...
https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close