Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

I see some drawings show gd&t without basic dimensions given. There is a little block onnthe drawing, says “basic dimensions are from CAD..”
My questions/concerns:
Most the time I’ve heard “drawings are amaster” so If now you rely on CAD.
The question: are all cad software reads/shows dimensions the same? Is the designer choosen 2 or 3 decimal on the basic dimensions? Should these numbers be allowed to round up?
As an inspector, we go with what are given on drawings then compare them with what on actual numbers on parts.
Another thing, now a day we see many drawings callout so crazy. Two surfaces, one at top and one at bottom, a perpendicular is used or an angularity is shown at one surface but without showing a reference datum... From these, I really want to see basic dimensions are shown on drawings when GD&T is used to ensure these calouts are correct and also help the designers/drafters know what they are doing.
For example, a FCF uses |A|D|F|, but there is no relationship between the feature to one of these datums. So if designers/drafters can get and put it on drawings.. then at least someone can figure it out.
What do you think/suggest?

RE: Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

Please delete the post I responded to if you are going to ask here as well.

RE: Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

Could you tell us, please, where (which forum) this discussion took place?

RE: Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

Yes, I deleted the other one.
Sorry for the confusion!

RE: Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

IMO, the drafting specs on each company and/or Disciple can be different for each project. Instead using the generic terms, the Engineer may tailor the CAD software in some ways to fit the design needs, such as the units, decimals, etc.
In a perfect world, the design drafting would be clear for the content as a basic requirement. In the meantime, if the fabricator or inspector have any questions regarding the design drafting, they should send the request of information to the Designer for clarification before moving on the work.

RE: Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions


RE: Drawings with GD&T callouts but no Basic Dimensions

At one time there was a drawing note that read:
So, in other words, if a dimension leads to a feature with a geometric control then that dimension is basic. Any other dimension not enclosed in a rectangle is a bilateral tolerance with the positional tolerance depending on how many decimal places and shown in the boilerplate notes in the SH1 drawing format.
This practice could also be applied to a MBD where there is no drawing at all.

ElectroMechanical Product Development
(Electronics Packaging)
UMD 1984
UCF 1993

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


eBook - Efficient and Effective Production Support with 3D Printed Jigs and Fixtures
Jigs and fixtures offer manufacturers a reliable process for delivering accurate, high-quality outcomes, whether for a specific part or feature, or for consistency across multiples of parts. Although the methodologies and materials for producing jigs and fixtures have evolved beyond the conventional metal tooling of years past, their position as a manufacturing staple remains constant due to the benefits they offer. Download Now
Overcoming Cutting Tool Challenges in Aerospace Machining
Aerospace manufacturing has always been on the cutting edge, from materials to production techniques. However, these two aspects of aerospace machining can conflict, as manufacturers strive to maintain machining efficiency with new materials by using new methods and cutting tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close