×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

(OP)
I am designing a one-storey RC house, the foundation is a raft foundation 45cm thick, with foundation beams (45cm height) (fully embedded inside the raft) interconnecting the frame columns.



1. The superstructure was designed with fully fixed supports at column bases but the foundation beams will be designed with winkler beams at column supports.
Support definition at column bases is:

UX - fixed
UY - fixed
UZ - spring with stiffness - RELEASED
RX - spring with stiffness - RELEASED
RY - spring with stiffness - RELEASED
RX - fixed


So now how do i choose the stiffness value for the 3 releases?

RE: Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

(OP)
I used the ks calculator within Robot Structural analysis as shown in the picture, but i only get the one value of UZ KZ = 65876.60kN/m

UX - fixed
UY - fixed
UZ - spring stiffness, KZ = 65876.60kN/m
RX - spring with stiffness - RELEASED
RY - spring with stiffness - RELEASED
RX - fixed

My question now is: do i also need to calculate the HX and HY values for the rotation stiffness or Robot will use the value from KZ stiffness to automatically determine the HX and HY stiffnesses?

RE: Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

Quote (kellez)

do i also need to calculate the HX and HY values for the rotation stiffness or Robot will use the value from KZ stiffness to automatically determine the HX and HY stiffnesses?
Please find the attached link:
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-an...
The workaround in 2013 and 2014 release is replacing HX elastic ground along bars by nodal elastic supports in rotation distributed along bars.

RE: Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

Kellez -

I'm not an expert in Robot. Unfortunately, I don't know that you're going to find too many Robot users on Eng-Tips. It's just not that widely used of a program in North America.

That being said, I have some comments:
1) You need to understand what your program is doing internally. I suspect it's merely converting the subgrade modulus into a vertical springs based on the area of the footing. But, that is merely a guess.
2) If the program is adding vertical springs along the length of the grade beam, then YOU need to investigate this a little deeper to determine if it gives you the behavior you're looking for. Start with simple models and see if the results agree with what you think they should be.

3) Now if you want to convert the subgrade modulus and footing area into a rotational spring, then how would you do this? I've done it by assuming a unit rotation of the footing and then calculating the soil reactions induced by that unit rotation. Note: I assume the soil can take tension and compression for simplicity in calculating the rotational reaction.

RE: Foundation beams design with Winkler springs - stiffness value???

(OP)

Quote (JoshPlum)

Kellez -

I'm not an expert in Robot. Unfortunately, I don't know that you're going to find too many Robot users on Eng-Tips. It's just not that widely used of a program in North America.

That being said, I have some comments:
1) You need to understand what your program is doing internally. I suspect it's merely converting the subgrade modulus into a vertical springs based on the area of the footing. But, that is merely a guess.

Well, yes this is exactly what the program is doing

2) If the program is adding vertical springs along the length of the grade beam, then YOU need to investigate this a little deeper to determine if it gives you the behavior you're looking for. Start with simple models and see if the results agree with what you think they should be.

Yes you can actually choose to add vertical springs along the whole length of the beams (elastic ground conditions), I actually did both, 1st i replaced the fully fixed supports at column bases with vertical springs and i also added elastic ground conditions along the whole length of the Foundation beams


3) Now if you want to convert the subgrade modulus and footing area into a rotational spring, then how would you do this? I've done it by assuming a unit rotation of the footing and then calculating the soil reactions induced by that unit rotation. Note: I assume the soil can take tension and compression for simplicity in calculating the rotational reaction.
Yes the soil will have both tension and compression to avoid any non linear analysis.

After reading some posts in the autodesk forum it seams that Robot doesnt take into account the rotational stiffness of the soil even if rotational springs are added but i am not sure yet.

I think i will proceed only with vertical springs for now.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close