×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Choice of design coefficients for seismic force resisting systems not in ASCE7?

Choice of design coefficients for seismic force resisting systems not in ASCE7?

Choice of design coefficients for seismic force resisting systems not in ASCE7?

(OP)
Hi guys,

I'm doing some preliminary design for a (as yet, hypothetical) structure in NYC. We're trying to play with some raking concrete columns/struts on the building's facade that, with 4 large columns on the building's 4 corners (think truss top/bottom chords) will resist part of the lateral loads with the rest being taken by a concrete core. The gravity load itself is more or less distributed evenly between the core and internal columns, with not much taken by the raked columns on the outside. Table 12.2-1 in ASCE7-10 only lists the coefficients for a buildings that fall within typical force resisting systems, but I can't find anywhere that talks about what to do when when a combination of systems are used- only combinations involving moment frames seem to be listed.

Does anybody have any guidance here?

RE: Choice of design coefficients for seismic force resisting systems not in ASCE7?

12.2.3? Combinations of different systems in the same direction.
(i.e. use the most stringent system limitations).

(ref. ASCE 7-10)

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close