×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

(OP)
I have some strange readings from an impact hammer and acceleromeeters. The hammer is from Piezotronics PCB Model 086D50 and the accelerometers are from Dytran model 3333A and 325M24.

On the first picture called Force you can see the plotted force magnitude in Newtons with number of samples. I have applied in total 4 impact with the hammer and the approx distance between each impact was approx 10 seconds. The force plot like this looks normal.

Figure 1 Force


However, if you zoom in the force plot close to the hammer response at rest, you can see that there are fluctuations in the data. This you can see on the second attached picture named ForceZoomedIn. Red arrows point on the events between impacts. Between each impact there is a distance of approx 10 sec and for this interval the force from the hammer should be around 0. But why do I have these jumps in the reading from x-axis when the hammer is at rest ? Can you clarify why this happens with the data reading from the hammer?

Figure 2 ForceZoomedIn


The same problem occurs with readings from the accelerometers. The attached figures are showing acceleration reading as result of 4 hammer impacts.
On the third picture called Acceleration you can see the plotted acceleration magnitude in m/s^2 with number of samples. The four acceleration peaks are result from four hammer impacts where distance between each impact is approx 10 sec. The acceleration plot like this looks normal.

Figure 3 Acceleration


Again, if you zoom in the acceleration plot close to the acceleration response at rest, you can see that there are drifts in the data over time. Red arrows point on the events between impacts. The fluctuations are present for both accelerometer models. This you can see on the fourth attached picture named AccelerometerZoomedIn.

Figure 4 AccelerometerZoomedIn


Between each event in the acceleration there is a distance of approx 10 sec and for this interval the acceleration reading should be around 0 because there is no excitation of the structure. But why do I have these jumps in the noise reading from x-axis when the vibration dissipates out?

Thank you!


Emina B.

RE: Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

Sample Number means nothing without knowing the Sample Rate and F-max. Why not present your X-axis in Time units? Typically there is only one impact per time record, so why the closely (apparently) spaced impacts? It is hard to tell whether your data and concern about it is significant.

Walt

RE: Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

(OP)
Here are the plots of force and acceleration with x-axis representing time in seconds.
Figure 1 Force

Figure 2 Force Zoomed IN

Figure 3 Acceleration

Figure 4 Acceleration Zoomed IN


Are the jumps in between impacts, or settling in the data for hammer and accelerometers in between impacts normal?
Can I consider these measurements as OK?
Is there a way how I can center the data around 0 on the x axis but for events in between impacts?

Emina B.

RE: Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

I suggest that you read the application notes from the manufacturer: http://www.pcb.com/Resources/Technical-Information... which explain, in some part, why what you are doing is not necessarily valid.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

RE: Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

My first thought was discharge time constant but your low amplitude signal looks quite wavy. Can you share the plots of transfer function as well as the coherence from the 4 averages?


Kind regards,
Jason

RE: Zero offset, zero drift or something else?

I have the same model PCB hammer. It has a Microdot cable connector on the end of the wood handle. Swinging a heavy sledge hammer with small cable and connector caused a lot of signal problems until I refitted a larger cable and connector. I can't comment further on the signal "noise", without knowing the entire instrument system and settings. I suspect the data shown is the result of poor test procedure and settings.

Walt

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - How ESI is Helping Move New Medical Device Product to Market Quicker & More Cost Effic
Early Supplier Involvement has long been a strategy employed by manufacturers to produce innovative products. Now, it almost seems like a necessity. Because decisions made in the design phase can positively affect product quality and costs, this can help add value to OEM bottom lines. This white paper will discuss many facets of ESI, including why it’s so valuable today, what challenges limit the benefits of ESI, how cost is impacted, and more. Download Now
White Paper - Moving to a Driverless Future
This white paper describes what we see as the best practices to support a sustainable engineering process for autonomous vehicle design. It exposes how to use simulation and testing in common frameworks to enable design exploration, verification and validation for the development of autonomous cars at a system, software and full-vehicle level to drive a mature product development process for automated driving. Download Now
Research Report - How Engineers are Using Remote Access
Remote access enables engineers to work from anywhere provided they have an internet connection. We surveyed our audience of engineers, designers and product managers to learn how they use remote access within their organizations. We wanted to know which industries have adopted remote access, which software they are using, and what features matter most. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close