Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Part 9 Canadian Code Strip Footings

Status
Not open for further replies.

Woody1515

Structural
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
72
Location
CA
Hello everyone,

I have a basic question regarding strip footing design, particularly for Part 9 structures from the NBCC (mostly residential). From my understanding, Part 9 gives design criteria for unreinforced concrete footings. Is it true that if the footing width and thickness meets the Part 9 requirements you can design these footings without any reinforcement? In my limited experience, I've seen many residential drawing packages with rebar in the strip footings.

Thanks!
 
Yes, it is true. Some engineers may specify longitudinal steel in strip footings, but that is essentially temperature steel. In most cases for Part 9 structures, the width of footing is small. A 24" wide strip footing supporting an 8" thick wall has a projection of only 8" on each side. If the depth is 8", transverse bars are not required.

BA
 
Agreed. In addition to temp and shrinkage, some engineers like that the longitudinal bars make the footing a bit of a beam element to allow the system to span over potential weak bits of soil. Often, however, you'll have a frost/stem wall better suited to that function anyhow though.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Thanks for your responses. I figured the rebar included in these footings was "extra". I always find it tough to determine when it is required to design above the Code requirements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top