Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Thru bolt loaded in single shear in concrete

Thru bolt loaded in single shear in concrete

Thru bolt loaded in single shear in concrete

If you have a thru bolt loaded in single shear bearing on a hole in a concrete member, is there any test data or evidence that can show that the stress distribution in the hole is parabolic instead of triangular?


RE: Thru bolt loaded in single shear in concrete

The stresses in the concrete and the steel bolt are very complex. Probably more parabolic than a nice neat triangle.
Just like most other things in structural engineering, we greatly simplify the load distribution, provided there is enough ductility for the connectors and base material to reach "design strength" without fracturing.
Just curious - what is the reason to sharpen the pencil for this condition? Usually, this type of connection is over-designed, and for good reason.

RE: Thru bolt loaded in single shear in concrete

The pencil sharpening is because we are pushing the envelope here. Usually, we are able to cast in a steel pipe thru which the bolt would be inserted. This, of course, increases the bearing area to the concrete considerably. This time, however, it is direct bolt-to-concrete bearing, so we have essentially line bearing right at the outside edge of the hole. That, coupled with a required phi factor of 0.65 in bearing, is really making it difficult to meet the required load. That's why I was looking for some justification for a parabolic distribution so I could use an average stress of 2/3 f'c instead of the 1/2 f'c for a triangle.
But, thanks for your input.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close