Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Related Articles


Parapet deflection

Parapet deflection

Parapet deflection

What does everyone use as the minimum deflection limit for parapets? Footnote i in Table 1604.3 of the IBC allows cantilever members to have twice the deflection of the wall. In an application where the wall deflection limit is L/180, that would allow a parapet deflection of L/90. Does that seem a bit excessive assuming it isn't affected by other factors such as siding, stucco, etc.

RE: Parapet deflection

If the siding is not affected by the deflection in terms of aesthetic damage or moisture I don't see why it would be excessive.

RE: Parapet deflection

Parapets are usually not very high, so I don't recall ever checking the deflection of a parapet. But allowing a parapet to deflect twice as much as a simple span seems to make sense.

For a simple span:
M = wL2/8; Δ = 5wL4/384EI
So Δspan = 5ML2/48EI

For a cantilever:
M = wL2/2; Δ = wL4/8EI
So Δcant = ML2/4EI

The main reason to limit deflection is to limit curvature which would cause cracking in brittle finishes. Curvature = M/EI, so to maintain the same curvature in a cantilever or a simple span:
Δcant/Δspan = 12/5 = 2.4, a little more than 2.0

Another reason to limit deflection is to limit P*δ, a moment magnifier. In the case of a parapet, P is very small and δ is about Δ/3 so that does not seem to be a concern.

This would suggest that if a simple span is permitted L/180 deflection, a cantilever should be permitted L/90.


RE: Parapet deflection

Great. Thank you for the feedback and explanation! This makes perfect sense.

RE: Parapet deflection

You are welcome.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close