Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

interpreting blow count to find friction angle

interpreting blow count to find friction angle

interpreting blow count to find friction angle

Hi. I have a very simple and maybe dumb question, but how do you interpret blow count N-value when there is a wide range in the blow count?

For example I am reading a boring report with N-values range from 18 to 50 blows which ranges from medium to dense. Can I just take the average and use N=34 to find my angle of internal friction?

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

No, because the soil and rock may vary across the site.

Even "IF" you knew expected that the soil was perfectly uniform across the site, an average still would not make sense, since it varies so much from hole to hole.

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

You have layers of soil beneath your site, some being more dense than others. You haven't mentioned the soil composition but based on your density descriptions I assume it is mostly sands.

You've given no indication of what you will be using the friction angles for, but under most circumstances it would not be sensible to just assume an average- for example if you are looking at embankment stability, the low strength layers might be the controlling factor.

Even estimating friction angles from SPT N-values is risky unless you know the soils very well...I would only be confident in this correlation with relatively sandy materials. Perhaps ask your geotech. for his opinion.

The question is not at all dumb, but requires further information if you're wanting an intelligent answer.


RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

There is what we call probabilistic calculation in geotechnical engineering. If you have the same soil type having different parameters you should compute the average value, the standard deviation and the average deviations. After that you need to pick a value that verify a certain condition but sadly i have never done such a job since its not required in my country so i want to point you toward the Eurocode 7 or any book in fact .

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

Assuming the blow count gives an approximate indication of relative density for granular and consistency of cohesive soil, the conservative approach would be to err on the low side with how you use the different numbers. One reason for making several test borings and other soil tests is to give you some indication of the variations from place to place and therefore gives you some basis for making judgements as to how to use the data. In other words one boring on building site may or may not be suitable, so we generally scatter them across the site and maybe do more if needed to clarify where to go with making judgements.

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

Based on your N-values and your description of "medium to dense", I guess you are talking about granular soils. So, I assume that you are trying to get the phi value to get the bearing capacity factors for calculating the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. There are several correlations between SPT N-value vs. phi.

If this is the case, I would try to have an idea of the preliminary size of the footings then just use the N-values within the zone of influence of the footings (2B of independent and 4B to 6B for continuous footings). Then, I would take the average N-value within the zone of influence of the footing minus one standard deviation (to account for soil variability). You can use two standard deviations but I think that it is too conservative (at the end you may be applying a FOS of 3 in your results)....

You can see here for the average minus the standard deviation approach (just statistics stuff): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68%E2%80%9395%E2%80%...

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

Here is a chart from Peck and others.

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

If you have some funny yellow dirt and the blow counts range from 10 to 20, sure you can take an average N-value for the funny yellow dirt and derive some character of that layer. You may have multiple layers and you can do that for those layers too!

As you look from boring to boring you may have some average for the yellow layer that ranges from 12 to 17. Some may advise you to take the lowest average N-value and use that site wide.

Hope that helps a bit?


ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: interpreting blow count to find friction angle

You did not mention the depths for your N-values. So, perhaps you can also consider for checking the phi values based on the effective stresses and N60 values. Then use the proper phi for the depth of influence of your foundations. See attached correlation chart from Coduto's book.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
The Great Project Profitability Debate
A/E firms have a great opportunity to lead the world into the future, but the industry’s greatest asset—real-time data—is sitting wasted in clunky, archaic ERP platforms. Learn how real-time, fully interactive dashboards in a modern ERP allow you to unlock data that will shape the future of the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close