×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

(OP)
I'm curious about your preferred way to analyze and develop a hybrid feedback control system, where the controller is actually made up of a few unconnected controllers that you switch between. The loop is a standard feedback loop: SP --> SPerror --> controller --> plant --> PV, and PV is fed back to get SPerror.

As an example, say you control Valve 1 a certain way if the SP error is small, and control Valve 2 a certain different way if the SP error is larger. Assume each valve has a different risetime and dead-time.

The controller in this case is a hybrid control made up of two controllers that control two plants (valves), and is nonlinear in nature.

How do you go about analyzing performance for such a system? Clearly it's east to analyze each loop independently (the Valve 1 control+plant loop, and the Valve 2 control+plant loop), but that doesn't characterize both together...

Independent loop analysis is especially not useful if trying to model the system with an input disturbance, since analyzing each loop independently wouldn't capture how the actual hybrid system would performs with both plants.

RE: Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

Have you looked at split ranging?
The greater the setpoint error, the greater the controller output.
Pneumatic actuators are available that act on only part of the range.
EG: with a 3to 15 psi output, actuators are available that will go from zero to full range with an input pressure of:
3 to 9 psi.
6 to 12 psi
or 9 to 15 psi.
The first actuator will act as the controller output increases from 3 to 9 psi,
the second actuator will act as the pressure rises from 6 to 12 psi
and the third actuator will act as the pressure rises from 9 to 15 psi.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

Typically this is not done with two controllers.

Per waross - Try Split Range with one controller: When controller is between 0 - 50%, it send the output to 0 - 100% of the small valve. When the controller is between 50-100%, it send the output to 0 - 100% of the large valve.

Another option with two controllers:
The controller for the small valve is controlled using the measured value only....like a single loop controller.
The controller for the large valve is controlled off the position of the small valve. So...if the small valve is open more than 80%, the large valve will start to open. If the small valve is less than 20% open, the large valve will start to close. If the small valve is between 20-80%, the large valve doesn't move.

With each of these, the Cv of the valves needs to be considered where they 'cross over'.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

What I have seen is that the controller tuning values are changed on the fly. Something you might want to look into. Switching controllers may be difficult due to making the transition bumpless.

RE: Switching between several controllers, depending on SP error.

Today, complicated and non-linear control systems are simulated.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close