Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Typically we use quasi-static loads on our system level structures. Because the system level models are so large we often recover interface forces from the system model (of different mating components) and then apply these forces at bolted joints of detailed stand alone 'fitting' models. Then we recover stresses in the joints. In this particular instance we have a random vibe load for our system model. We are using cbush elements to recover the forces and as you all know the RMS force values have no phase information and thus are all 'positive' in nature. I realize the correct manner to do the proper stress analysis would be to incorporate the detailed fitting model into the system model and recover RMS stresses. Does anyone have any experience applying random vibe interface forces to stand alone highly detailed fitting models? Applying all 'positive' values isn't really appropriate.

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Hmmmm. That's a three pipe problem, as Holmes'would put it. I think the answer is that you can't safely do much without phase information, but our excellent friend at http://www.vibrationdata.com may well have appropriate advice. The fundamental issue is thst if you just add every frequency component in phase you will deliver a most unlikely shock.


Greg Locock

New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Don't confuse the RMS magnitudes of the forces whether individually or summed, with the time evolution of the actual forces. If you do the phase information is lost. In otherwords, all modes word be excited in phase and produce grossly misleading results.

Basic maths...

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Thanks GregLocock and hacksaw for the replies.
I'll check out the vibrationdata site.

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

what if you work at the FRF levels?

  • for each cbush in your joint extract the FRF (based on 1g sine sweep analysis). Each FRF is complex
  • at each frequency you can add all the Re and Im part of the all the FRFs
  • once you have the SUM FRF at each freq. f, estimate the magnitude: SQRT(Re^2+Im^2)
  • if you then take at each freq. f: PSDinterfarce(f)= mag^2*PDS(f),you might end up with the PSD "resultant" for the interface
Just a thought and might be totally wrong !!

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Thanks JXB0809,
I'll look into that. Thanks for your thoughts.

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Feel free to report your thinking

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

Here's a different perspective that I've not verified:
1. Create 'long' time domain signal that satisfies the RMS profile
2. From FEA, extract individual transfer functions of force_at_bolts/input_motion (complex numbers)
3. Apply transfer functions on input signal to calculate forces in time domain

The output will have phase content. Interactions of closely spaced modes could be accounted for. Statistical analysis needs to be performed on the input and output to verify the law of large numbers is satisfied.

In principle, evaluations can be done in the time domain peak loads.

Kind regards,

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

with such approach don't you need a signal of very long duration to satisfies the random assumption. Might be very prohibitive to do an analysis with such signal!

RE: Interface force recovery from Random Vibration using FEA

That's a good question! I re-framed the question as: "how many normally distributed random points are needed before the standard deviation converges?"

A simple Matlab code below plots the standard deviation of different data block size. At around 10^5, it appears to converge.

CODE --> matlab

pow = 1:0.5:8;
tries = 10;
s=zeros(length(pow), tries);
for ct2=1:tries     
    for ct = 1:length(pow); 
        N = round(10^pow(ct));
        q = randn(N,1);        
        s(ct,ct2) = std(q);       
loglog(10.^pow, s, '*-')
xlabel('Length of Random Values'); ylabel('Standard Deviation');
title('Standard Deviation of Various Length of Gaussian Random Numbers')
grid on 

Kind regards,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close