Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Does anyone have experience with MT

Does anyone have experience with MT

Does anyone have experience with MT

Does anyone have experience with MTO (Ontario) contracts?
We are at a bit of stand off here with the interpretation of a contract that references a special provision that calls for a Quality Verification Engineer (QVE) signing a Certificate of Conformance (CofC) signing off on these precast culverts we are fabricating.
The issue is that every item of the MTO bid document that requires a CofC signed by a QVE, explicitly calls for it; whereas the culvert item only calls for Certificate of Conformance only but not signed by a QVE, furthermore, the other item sections define CofC as a document signed by a QVE, but the culvert item section does not contain that definition.
What the bid document says is in the General Special Provisions, at the begining of the document, it mentions that provision to have CofC signed by a QVE (199S48).
So I guess my question is if 199S48 applies to ALL the items on the bid (being in the General Specific Provisions and all) and the fact that they specifically mention the need of CofC signed by a QVE on some items only, is just a redundancy?

The temporal solution we've given to this is to proceed with CofC by QVE, because that is the safe thing to do.... better more than less, right? but I think it would be nice to save some money by sparing the use of the engineer, no?

Some input would be really appreciated


RE: Does anyone have experience with MT

You need someone with contract administration experience. If the contract is ambiguous, case law is on your side and then you have a good chance of 'winning' your argument (not advocating that a legal route is correct... only part of your argument).


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close