×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

How to draw a multi span beam in Etabs 2008 vs Etabs 2013

How to draw a multi span beam in Etabs 2008 vs Etabs 2013

How to draw a multi span beam in Etabs 2008 vs Etabs 2013

(OP)
Dear All

How to draw a multiple span beam in Etabs/SAP as there are so many possiblities:
mesh/divide/full beam/separate spans/2008/2013
Possibilities are so numerous that I am lost...

Regaards

RE: How to draw a multi span beam in Etabs 2008 vs Etabs 2013

Hi there!

So you are new with ETABS, I wish I had had someone to ask this kind of questions when I had just started. Therefore it is great to help others as I may.

If you are using ETABS 2013, whatever option of the above mentioned will be fine, except for the "mesh" option, meshing applies to shell elements and frame elements but it does not help you to draw a multi span beam.

Here is one option: Set the grid system including supports as grid lines. Then draw the line starting at the firs support and ending where the support is supposed to be, an continue on to the next supposed to be support grid, go on. Once you drew all the spans, assign supports by right clicking the points where you want each support and then going to assign→joint-restraint, now pick the type of support you need.

Hope it helps!

RE: How to draw a multi span beam in Etabs 2008 vs Etabs 2013

(OP)
Thanks cyrosmith85
So this way I have both options in Etabs 2013: draw it from start to end one shot, or stop at each support, which seems preferable according to you (and to me also)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close