Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Battery drop test in ANSYS

Battery drop test in ANSYS

Battery drop test in ANSYS

Hello all,

I would like to simulate real drop test in ANSYS environment for my batteries. Basically battery will exhibit "free fall"(no initial velocity) from 1,5 meter height to the concrete floor.

My questions are:

1. Which analysis type i should prefer? Implicit/explicit or transient?

2. Do i need to consider inertia relief for this type of problem? Which analysis type consider this and which one is NOT?

3. Considering 1,5 meter height, it seems to me simulation will take longer hours to solve. What is the correct and easy way to reduce the total simulation time? With and without mass scaling? Is there a way for example to skip duration for 1 meter height without losing any accuracy?

4. In explicit ones, my friend told me that just defining " standart earth gravity" wouldn't simulate the problem and advice to define initial velocity which is very small in order to simulate free fall. Is this correct? Should i define very low inital velocity along with standart earth gravity just for the sake of ticking the box?

Your detailed answers would be very much appreciated.
Many thanks.

RE: Battery drop test in ANSYS

Please download ANSYS Explicit STR tutorials from their website. You will find drop test tutorials there.

In the tutorials I have seen, the dropped part is initially next to floor and it is given an initial velocity.

RE: Battery drop test in ANSYS

Think carefully about the phenomenon you are trying to capture, what experimental data you have to provide as high-fidelity input and for verification purposes, and what experimental data you have for validation purposes, etc. What sort of physics is relevant for the ultimate question you want the model to answer? What is NOT relevant? What sanity checks should the model pass? .. .. ..

Once you have thought of such higher-level questions, then the simulation strategy can be put in place. Until then, you will get lost by hearsay and details.

Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close