Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


17/7 PH TH1050 Heat Treat Procedure

17/7 PH TH1050 Heat Treat Procedure

17/7 PH TH1050 Heat Treat Procedure

We have a tubular structure made from 0.050" wall 1.5" diameter 17/7 tubing that is 14 ft long x 2 ft x 2 ft that requires heat treat to TH1050. We have determined vacuum heat treat is not necessary and our customer is now thinking that the full UTS and YS is not a necessity. Part of the expense we are considering the need for is the cooling to 60 deg F in one hour after the austenitizing (1400 deg F) stage. The heat treat companies I contacted don't have a good way to do this for so large a structure. In that the structure is primarily 0.050" wall tubing, if the heat treat company cooled with forced air or compressed air and the time to get to 60 deg F was longer, say 2 hours, what affect would that be to the YS and UTS? Can anyone give me some information on the expected YS and UTS in relation to the cool time?

Any input would be appreciated.

Kim Taylor PE
Mechanical Engineer

RE: 17/7 PH TH1050 Heat Treat Procedure

OK, I am sure that the guys that wrote that spec lived in sir conditioned offices.
I have found that fan cooling to something under 80F seems to work just fine.
The time is important, you want to cool quickly so fans are fine for thin wall like you have.
But the lower temp really just needs to be below the martensite finish temp, and with today's chemistries that is not 60F.
What is most critical is cooling below 800F, this needs to be as fast as practical. If you can only cool to 80F I would expect only a slight decease in strength after aging.
Now the welds may end up slightly lower strength (I don't know what the Ms of the welds will be) but if you can give up a little strength then you will be fine.
There is plenty of margin since we usually see properties well above the minimums in thin wall tubing.
(is this Plymouth Tube product?)
I know where there are a number of vacuum furnaces longer than 14', but the cost is rather high.
If you do this in air then pickling is critical, if there is any heat tint the corrosion resistance will be very poor (the will rust stain in open air).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close