×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Suggestions on improving usage of CBUSH elements in Nastran

Suggestions on improving usage of CBUSH elements in Nastran

Suggestions on improving usage of CBUSH elements in Nastran

(OP)
Hello,
I have a few questions regarding usage of CBUSH elements for modeling fasteners in Nastran.

If 1 represents the X direction along the fastener length, then 2,3 represents the other two shear directions.

I usually use Huth Formulation for representing fastener stiffness.

Axial stiffness is calculated using formula, K1 = AE/L, (L = length of the fastener).

For rotational stiffness, either I give 10^9 or I calculate stiffness based on the formula:

K5,6 = (1/e)*(Max (K2,K3)*(Lcbush^2/4))

where 1/e =100
Lcbush = length of CBUSH element

For K4, I specify a low value of 100 or so.

All the above based on this article: http://www.aerospacengineering.net/?p=244

I usually find that axial stiffness is very high value compared to shear stiffness. If the structure is a simple lap joint or such where one knows the deformation pattern based on loading, appropriate SPCs can be provided. However, in complex assemblies, I usually input all stiffnesses cause:

1. Failing which I get a rigid body motion error
2. Don't know the individual deformation before hand and thus difficult to provide individual SPCs

Sometimes, the above approach can provide incorrect results. For ex, in some cases, I find that rivets reacting much of the load in tension/compression instead of the preferred shear mechanism. I am looking for guidelines on how to overcome situations like the above in complex assemblies and if possible, get some pointers on best practices for using CBUSH elements.

Thx

EDIT: If I set the axial stiffness value to a low number lets say 500 instead of the usual 7 digits (units lbs/in), will it help? Thought is, making shear stiffness higher will force the load to flow in that direction instead of axial. I guess I will try and see if I run in to rigid body motion issues. Still, I would appreciate suggestions from experienced personnel.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Manufacturing the Cars of Tomorrow
In this ebook, we'll explore how additive manufacturing is going to transform the way cars are made. This includes commentary from thought leaders such as Ford's CTO, Ken Washington, Customer case studies of ways 3D printing is being used today, and a variety of part examples where 3D printing is already impacting how automobiles are made. Download Now
White Paper - Smart Manufacturing for Semiconductor
New technologies and approaches present great opportunities for semiconductor manufacturers to achieve high levels of innovation, yield and improvement. This white paper explores some of these cutting-edge technologies and how they can be applied effectively in the semiconductor industry. Read about how Smart Manufacturing is transforming the semiconductor industry. Download Now
White Paper - Analysis and Simulation in Aircraft Structure Certification
Organizations using simulation and analysis tools effectively see the benefits in their ability to achieve certification faster and with drastically less total cost than those who do not maximize these tools. Read this White Paper to learn about how digital tools such as analysis and simulation help in aircraft structure certification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close