Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Stress Update at every Gauss Point ???

Stress Update at every Gauss Point ???

Stress Update at every Gauss Point ???

Please could someone assist me with the following :

(For this, assume the Von Mises failure criterion is used. Also assume that the material is linear elastic with zero hardening (perfect plasticity) and isotropic. Assume the problem is 2D, with no temperature effects. The externally applied load is applied in load increments. )

Its with regard to the stress update (return mapping of elastic trial stresses to the yield surface) at every gauss point within every element. (This is how numerous books say it...)

My understanding is that you first carry out an elastic analysis to determine the overall displacements. Thereafter you compute the strains and elastic trial stresses. This gives you a cauchy tensor ( or voigt vector ) of stress components for the entire element. You dont get a cauchy tensor for each gauss point.

Thereafter you compute the yield criterion to determine if the element response is elastic or plastic.
If the response is plastic a stress update procedure(J2 radial return method) can be used to return the stresses to the yield surface.

I understand that gaussian quadrature is used to approximate the exact solution of the components in the elemental stiffness matrix as well as the components of the elemental internal force vector.

So with the above said, how is it possible that every gauss point is assigned its own cauchy tensor? When the cauchy tensor is applicable to the entire element.

Or should we split the updated cauchy tensor according to the weights of the Gaussian quadrature procedure - and assign these tensors to the gauss points?

Please help , I'm abit confused :( :(

RE: Stress Update at every Gauss Point ???

Why do you only have one Cauchy stress tensor for the whole element? I would expect to do it at each Gauss point. It will be different across the element, so you'd lose information by summarizing it with a single tensor.

In case you do need a single tensor for the whole element. Then perhaps use the mean? That is, the integral of the Gauss point values divided by the element volume.

Weighting values by the Gauss weights is part of the Gaussian integration procedure. So if you're integrating the Cauchy stress tensor, then yes, you'd need to weight the values at the Gaussian points. If you're doing something else with it, like comparing against the yield criterion, then no, I don't think it's correct to weight the values.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close