Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Hydronic Heating Takeoff Locations

Hydronic Heating Takeoff Locations

Hydronic Heating Takeoff Locations

Hey All,

We have a typical detail we use on our drawings for a typical piping takeoff from a hydronic heating main to a branch (see attached picture), however there are a few of us that are looking at it now and are trying to figure out why taking a branch off the top of the main isn't "acceptable" and why there isn't even an option for taking it off of the bottom... The detail predates pretty much everyone here and I can't seem to find anything in our local codes or standards. Anyone have a clue why this detail is the way it is? We were thinking it might have something to do with the force that pipe expansion might have on the 90deg elbow and trying to mitigate that with a 45...

RE: Hydronic Heating Takeoff Locations

my best guess is 45° has less pressure drop. I assume they didn't want to allow a horizontal take-off to allow some pipe expansion by the take-off torquing the main.

thanks for questioning old details. i see too many designs where people detail or specify something because someone 100 years ago thought something and we never changed.
Many designers just know one thing, but don;'t know why, so they can't adapt to different circumstances.
Same thing with balancing valves on pumps with VFDs....

RE: Hydronic Heating Takeoff Locations

I don't know the reason for the unacceptable option, but I agree with EnergyProfessional.
I have been told the reason for avoiding bottom take-off's in hydronic systems is the possibility of debris, sand, sediments (that may accumulate at the bottom of the main) migrating to valves, strains, controls, etc.

"Engineering is achieving function while avoiding failure." - Henry Petroski

RE: Hydronic Heating Takeoff Locations

Air tends to collect on the top for water carrying pipes.So it isn't a great location to tap into.However for a steam line it is quite the opposite ie tap from the top to prevent condensate flowing into branches!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close