I guess I just see the corner of the landing at the columns as being adequately supported vertically.
But the diagonal corner of the landing, away from the columns, would to me simply sag downward unless the far side stringer was somehow a kinked, or bent, rigid member that would have continuous stiffness through the bend at the top riser and extend past and under the landing.
It is very difficult to get wood moment connections to work.
And based on the era of this construction I would think the whole thing just sort of hung together, until the wood and fasteners started to get weathered a bit...a continuous, slow increase in flexibility until someone had to come along and insert a post under that interior landing corner.
Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
faq731-376