Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


HW/d ratio for Water Quality Flow Splitters

HW/d ratio for Water Quality Flow Splitters

HW/d ratio for Water Quality Flow Splitters

I have a typical manhole with a concrete weir that acts as a flow splitter to separate the water quality flowrate and the high flow bypass. Local Ecology design manuals recommend a minimum headwater to low flow pipe diameter outlet ratio of 2.0. Most culvert design references refer to a HW/d ration of 1.2 or 1.5. It's my understanding Ecology recommends 2.0 in order to ensure submerged conditions so orifice equations are applicable. If that is true, then why is culvert design allowed to use 1.2 and 1.5 ratios? I would like to use a lower ratio than 2.0 (keep the weir height lower) with an 8" diameter pipe in order to prevent unwanted additional flow from my treatment train. If I reduce the pipe size to 6" diameter and set the flow to what is required and work backwards through the equations, the HW/d ratio becomes too big, i.e. in excess of 4 or 5. I don't like having such a high weir wall with a smaller pipe as it backs up water in the upstream conveyance system.

So, my question is this...will a HW/d ratio of 1.2 or 1.5 be sufficient in a typical flow splitter manhole such that submerged conditions can still be assumed and orifice equations still be applicable? Is the HW/d ratio of 2.0 recommended by Ecology overly conservative? Thank you.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close