×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 650 Frangible Roof Hydro Test

API 650 Frangible Roof Hydro Test

API 650 Frangible Roof Hydro Test

(OP)
We're building a 95' ID fixed frangible roof MDI tank with a nitrogen blanket. The shell is 32' high and the design liquid level is 31'. When reading 7.3.7.1 it gives you the option of either vacuum testing the roof plates and the remaining 1' of vert or filling the tank with air and snooping unless you are building a frangible roof.

My question is when using the Decision Tree in annex F if I fall in the basic design does this exempt me from having to fill the void with air and snooping? I would rather vacuum box the roof and shell.

Thanks in advance!


7.3.7.1 Upon completion, the roof of a tank designed to be gas-tight (except for roofs designed under 7.3.7.2, F.4.4, and F.7.6) shall be tested by one of the following methods.
a) Applying internal air pressure not exceeding the weight of the roof plates and applying to the weld joints a bubble
solution or other material suitable for the detection of leaks.
b) Vacuum testing the weld joints in accordance with 8.6 to detect any leaks.

RE: API 650 Frangible Roof Hydro Test

I'm not sure where the issue is. The wording in 7.3.7.1 doesn't mention frangibility or lack thereof that I see, nor does the decision tree in Appendix F. "Unless you are building a frangible roof" isn't in there.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close