×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

output vector list for composites

output vector list for composites

output vector list for composites

(OP)
Hi:

I have recently switched from NEi Nastran to NX Nastran and my work is often with composites. Both use the FEMAP pre and post processor. NEi used to publish some of their output results column descriptions in the release guides but I haven't found the equivalent yet for NX, it might be with the webkey help area? In particular I used to use the output vector 6103 "COMP MAX FAILURE INDEX" for the overall failure index of the layup for a shell element. NX offers the output vector 6060 "Laminate Max Failure Index". Are these output vectors equivalent? The descriptions are similar but different.

Tom Stanley

RE: output vector list for composites

Hi,

It should be the same results depending on what you've defined as a failure criteria (Hill, Hoffman...)

You can refers to the laminate chapter to learn more on how Failure Indice is calculated for each criteria.

FEMAP\v111\nastranhelp\NXNastran\nast\misc\doc\docs\en_US\tdoc\pdf\User.pdf

regards,

Seif Eddine Naffoussi, Stress Engineer
www.Innovamech.com
33650 Martillac û France

RE: output vector list for composites

(OP)
Thank You:

That is what I wanted to hear, that for a given criteria, they each use the same way of calculating it. It is just that each software company seems to want to use their own nomenclature for various features, commands, etc. and sometimes it gets confusing.

Tom Stanley

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close