×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Cracked weld, follow-up

Cracked weld, follow-up

Cracked weld, follow-up

(OP)
Hello all.

For background please see weld puzzler thread.

Much has been written on the effects of dynamic loads on various welded configurations.  It seems the configuration for my problem is the worst type when it comes to fatigue capacity.  (A fillet weld across a bending member.)

Also, intermittent fillet welds are prohibited for most applications where stress reversal is involved.  THere are situations where intermittent is okay, but if there's no real good reason to use intermittent welds, then why not weld solid?

Initially the finger was pointed at the welds because that's where the cracks were.  We cut out a piece of the crack and found the surface to be smooth as glass.  This is a classic indicator for a fatigue failure.  Once the smooth crack has propagated too far, the material snaps leaving the remainder of the crack with a rough face.

So I recommended the weld be made larger, continuous with a minimum preheat of 225 F.  And then they decided to fix it their way.

Life....

All the best.

RE: Cracked weld, follow-up

There's 3 ways to do things:
1. the right way
2. the wrong way
& 3. the bosses' way




RE: Cracked weld, follow-up

With any luck they will consult with someone else when it breaks the next time.  Makes one feel invaluable does it not?


Rod

RE: Cracked weld, follow-up

Thanks for giving the update.  Often
the quickest answer wins.  Sorry that
you were overruled and did not have time
to evaluate all possibilities.  Rest assured
that they will be back.  

RE: Cracked weld, follow-up

Some reasons continuous welds are not used
1. Heat Affection
2. Time
3. Locations

Some times too much heat is just as bad as too little.  Additional renforcing may be a better alternative that welding continous

RE: Cracked weld, follow-up

(OP)
Hi CivlEng:

Yup, I agree with you.  "If there's no real reason to use intermittent welds, why not weld solid?"  So if heat is going to cause warpage, or the cost of continuous welds is too high or fabrication time is too long, then you might want to take a look at intermittent welds.  But, on a dynamically loaded structure, be careful.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close