×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

DSP - Restore Clipped Signal

DSP - Restore Clipped Signal

DSP - Restore Clipped Signal

(OP)
In the process of collecting vibration data, a large component of one channel was clipped. The data was acquired on an analog recorder and has been subsequently digitized. (The analog tapes are still available.) The digitizer's sampling frequency was about 10-times that of the dominant waveform that was clipped so there is a significant amount of "good" data (nominally 10 points per cycle). What is the best way of reconstructing the signal in the clipped regions? It seems that a simple interpolation using y=A*Sin(w*t) should work -- but I've got a brain-block when trying to solve the simultaneous equations.

The frequency does vary with time but is stable over many (>50) cycles.

The data was from an intermediate state of a structure that cannot be recreated.

RE: DSP - Restore Clipped Signal

(OP)
Tom,

Thanks for the offer but I've gone off on a slightly different tack for now. Even though the data is compromised, I want to use a reconstruction technique that has the best (theoretical) chance of replicating the data. I had given thought to the cubic spline -- but the signal is best approximated by a sin fuction. So, even though the computational overhead is greater, what I'm in the process of doing is using snippets of the good data, (immediately before and following the clipped section) and performing a nonlinear (least squares) curve fit to a sin function. Once I complete the programming, I will compare the results with output from a cubic spline and a neural network.
I've got a sneaking suspicion that the statistical performance of all three methods will be about the same.

Thanks and Happy Holidays,
-Tim-

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close