Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Gravity wall on slope with flat area

Gravity wall on slope with flat area

Gravity wall on slope with flat area

I have the attached where the retaining walls have a proposed flat area on an otherwise sloped hill. I don't have any information on the soil properties at the site this will be going on. They are trying to adapt a standard DOT design based on assumed soil properties (friction angle = 28 degrees) to this case but the standard gravity wall would be limited to only 4'-6" high due to the slope according to the DOT drawing.

Can the level area behind the wall be used to decrease the force on the wall from the sloped backfill above this level area?

RE: Gravity wall on slope with flat area

A trial wedge analysis can provide the thrust from an irregular backslope condition which should be less than the simple infinite slope condition. Solving for your model requires a math exercise with a spreadsheet. You could also approximate a lessor backslope (say 3:1) that would split the difference between the level and sloping sections as a rough guess.

However, building walls on steep slopes (2:1) can be quite risky. The concept of having a 26.6 deg slope with a 28 deg backfill material would not provide much stability prior to constructing a wall on the slope. A global stability analysis of the proposed construction would be extremely poor. You would really have to have some more positive information about the soils in the hill before guesstimating a design on a steep slope.

The concept of the horizontal bench is correct and having significant embedment on a slope is good, the exact amount can be argued about given the wall is not that tall. The 4' bench is typically an AASHTO requirement and would be a conservative position considering no soils information provided.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close