Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Fillet Below AWS Minimum

Fillet Below AWS Minimum

Fillet Below AWS Minimum

AWS specifies minimum fillet sizes based on the thickness of the parts being joined. My question is what to do if a part has already been welded with a size below the code minimum.

I am OK with the smaller weld size based on strength required at that joint, but not sure what to do about code compliance. Options as I see them:

1. Build up the weld to the minimum size. However, it seems like that would not address the underlying reason for the minimum sizes, which is based on getting a quality weld with good ductility and fusion. You could just be covering up a poor weld.

2. Gouge out and reweld at the correct size. Certainly would fix it, but more work than I want to do

3. Leave as is. I have mag particle testing showing the welds are good, and I am good with the strength of the as-welded size. Only concern here might be that MT would not necessarily reveal sub-surface fusion issues.

I am leaning toward #3. I think I would feel comfortable defending that.

Anyone out there have any thoughts to share?

RE: Fillet Below AWS Minimum

There is more information needed to make a rational decision.
What welding process was used?
Was the component preheated to the appropriate temperature?
Was low hydrogen electrode used or was a low hydrogen welding process used, i.e., GMAW or GTAW used?
Was the base metal properly cleaned prior to welding?
If SMAW was used, was the electrode a low hydrogen type and was it properly stored?
Do the existing welds contain any defects?
What are the ramifications if the welds fail in service?

The bottom line is if the welds are not per code, are you as the Owner's representative, i.e., Engineer, willing to accept the added liability of the fabricator's mistake?

Best regards - Al

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close