×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

(OP)
We currently have valve seats machined from extruded Nylon 6/6 rod. We are investigating the possibility of having these molded. Our concern is the change of physical properties that may occur. Does anyone have information on this subject.

Thanks,
Gary

RE: Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

Changes do occur for several reasons, these being:-
  1) Rod is extruded, and a high molecular weight (high  viscosity) material must be used in the extrusion process so as to be able to hold the profile in the moulten state, whereas lower molecular weight (low viscosity) material is normaly used in injection moulding. High molecular weight gives improved toughness
  2) Rod is extruded in a thick section, when compared to typical injection mouldings, this leads to a very slow cooling and therefore solidifying (or freezing) rate. This causes a high level of crystalisation, with the formation of large crystals. Injection moulding grades generally have a neucleating agent to increase crystalisation in the much shorter freezing times typical of injection moulding, but this grows a very large number of very small crystals.
  3) The different cooling rates, and therefore crystalisation  and shrinkage from the skin to the core of rod, leads to internal stresses at a level not seen in typical injection mouldings. This is exasivated by differential moisture contents accross the rod as it absorbs moisture at its surface.
  4) When machineing the rod, you remove the surface layer, which is more amorphous, and has some molecular alignment in the direction fo flow.
  5) When machineing the rod, you create notches which act as stress risers, increasing the chance of breakage.
  6) It is rare that a machined prototype is the exact same design as the final moulded part, as the machinest generally takes a lot more time to perfect his work when making a permanent mould vs a temporary, experimental prototype. The moulded part design will normally pay attention to eliminating unnecessary material, so as to save material costs and improve cycle time, whereas, in a prototype from barstock, the machineist simply removes any material that is in the way, regards functionality of the part.

I know it is complicated, with a number of contradictions.

More details about the design and conditions of use would help in giveing a straight answer.

e-mail me direct with drawings, photo's etc if you like

Regards
pat

RE: Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

(OP)
The part is a simple washer type seat.
It measures .680 OD x .375 ID x .085 THK
in service it sees about 3000 psi on the face and about a 385 lb. load from the ball along the sealing surface (about .405 diameter).

Do you feel the compressive strentgh will change enough to alter the resultant coined surface created by contact of the ball to the seat during pressurization?

Thanks for the help

RE: Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

I expect the compressive strength will probably increase slightly, but tensile will most probably decrease slightly, and elongation at break will most certainly decrease noticably if not dramaticaly.

Make sure the nylon is conditioned to the environment in which it will be used. Nylon is hydroscopic, and does take a long time to reach equilibrium.

If nylon is conditioned in 100% RH, it can loose up to 70% of it's flex mod compared to dry as moulded nylon.  

I expect that the compressive strength will also be dramatically effected.

I can try to find some data, but it has been buried for quite a few years.

Regards
pat

RE: Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

(OP)
Thanks,
do you suspect any changes in coefficients of friction.
We have concerns with the actuation forces resultant of the valve ball loaded on the nylon seat when pressurized.
It sounds like your telling me these seats in a molded condition may be relatively harder or more brittle.
Do you think if they are too brittle and do not seal on the ball, the nylon could be conditioned in some way?

RE: Physical properties differences of machined vs molded

Yes
They will be relatively harder and more brittle, but not to a huge degree. Also, the tougher extruded material will have lots of notches from the machining, which will counteract the inherent extra toughness.

Moisture conditioning to the environment is essential if you want any indication of real world results from your tests.

Unfilled nylon 6.6 changes up to 300% in some properties when fully conditioned vs dry as moulded.

Also, from memory, the anealing temperature for nylon 6.6 dry is about 180 deg C, but imersed in water, the anealing temp is below 70 deg C, so if accelerating moisture conditioning by heating in water, be carefull to consider the effects of anealing as well.

Moisture is rapidly attracted to the surface of nylon, as it is quite hydroscopic, but the diffusion rate through the nylon into the core of the moulding is very slow, and at room temperature, takes many monthe to approach equilibrium.

Equilibrium at 50% RH is about 3% moisture content, and this causes a linear swelling of about 1%

All this is from memory, so the figures might not be dead accurate, but they will be in the ballpark.

I do have a lot of time, RH, Temperature, section thickness related graphs, but it is quite a bit of work to dig them out.

Regards
pat

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Reshoring Prototyping and Production
In this whitepaper, we'll provide insight into why and when it makes sense for U.S. manufacturers to reshore prototyping and production, and how companies can leverage the benefits of working with local design, prototype, and manufacturing partners during the pandemic and beyond. Download Now
Engineering Report - Top 10 Defect Types in Production
This 22-page report from Instrumental identifies the most common production defect types discovered in 2020, showcases trends from 2019 to 2020, and provides insights on how to prevent potential downtime in 2021. Unlike other methods, Instrumental drives correlations between a variety of data sources to help engineers find and fix root causes. Download Now
White Paper - Addressing Tooling and Casting Requirements at the Design Stage
Several of the tooling and casting requirements of a part can be addressed at the design stage. If these requirements are not addressed at the design stage, lot of time is spent in design iteration when the design reaches the die caster. These design issues lead to increase in time and cost of production leading to delay in time to market and reduced profits for the organization. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close