×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Simulation of cutters

Simulation of cutters

Simulation of cutters

(OP)
I am trying to simulate a simple problem of finding the reaction force to a set of primary cutters that are being driven by some secondary cutters through a pin connection

My assembly can be found here

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2zvthm4q7vkh9qo/AABWG57...

The cutters on the left are the primary cutters and the cutters on the right are secondary

I have a fixed support at the blades of the primary cutters because this is the reaction force i wish to check. Also either side of the pin of those primary cutters are fixed

Global contacts set to no penetration

The resultant reaction force is very wrong and much less than expected through game calculations.

Any help would be much appreciated
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Simulation of cutters

(OP)
*The resultant reaction force is very wrong and much less than expected compared to HAND calculations.

RE: Simulation of cutters

I can't DL your model at work, but I do have a few pointers/questions.

How did you model the pin connection? Did you use CAD geometry? If you did, then I suggest you remove the pin CAD and add in a pin connection within SolidWorks simulation (make sure to allow on axis rotation).

Does a fixed support accurately represent the constraint in your hand calculation? A fixed support prevents all nodal motion over the defined geometry (all translations for solid elements and all translations and rotations for shell and beam elements). It may not be obvious, but you could be introducing reaction loads in your FEM that might not be realistic.

Finally, you need to be careful when using a global contact definition of no penetration, because this can sometimes cause unintended issues. If you're going to use a no penetration condition, then it's best to manually set them up. You might very well be fine using a Bonded or Allow Penetration global definition depending on your geometry and how the system works.

RE: Simulation of cutters

(OP)
Thank you so much for taking the time to answer Shaun!

It works now!!!

I took on board your advice - switched to global contact of "Allow penetration" and I incorporated local non-penetration contacts in all the necessary areas.

The fixed support at the blades did provide an accurate constraint with results mirroring my hand calculations when i applied the "reaction force" tool at the blades after results were run.

Once again, thanks heaps!!!!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close